Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 13381–13390
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that some articles were not about the Petitioner but about the competitions he participated in; other articles lacked identified authors or dates; and none of the publications were shown to be professional, major trade, or major media outlets with comparably high circulation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that some articles were not about the Petitioner but about the competitions he participated in; other articles lacked identified authors or dates; and none of the publications were shown to be professional, major trade, or major media outlets with comparably high circulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-12_01_B2203; source_row=25391 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed the HR Retail Leader award, first given in 2019, lacked evidence of national/international recognition beyond the inaugural conference. The five National Training Awards were awarded to the employer, not to the Petitioner himself, and testimonial letters attributing the awards to the Petitioner's work did not satisfy the plain language of the regulation requiring the individual petitioner to be the actual recipient.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the HR Retail Leader award, first given in 2019, lacked evidence of national/international recognition beyond the inaugural conference. The five National Training Awards were awarded to the employer, not to the Petitioner himself, and testimonial letters attributing the awards to the Petitioner's work did not satisfy the plain language of the regulation requiring the individual petitioner to be the actual recipient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-12_02_B2203; source_row=25395 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO disagreed with the Director's characterization of the membership as a certification, finding it is a genuine association membership. However, AAO agreed the criterion was not met because the record contained inconsistent descriptions of Fellow membership requirements between the CEO's letter and the articles of association, and neither clearly established that outstanding achievements were required or that applications…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director's characterization of the membership as a certification, finding it is a genuine association membership. However, AAO agreed the criterion was not met because the record contained inconsistent descriptions of Fellow membership requirements between the CEO's letter and the articles of association, and neither clearly established that outstanding achievements were required or that applications were judged by recognized national or international experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-12_02_B2203; source_row=25396 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner did not establish that his 'value-added' changes to an existing degree program constituted an 'original contribution,' as the program predated his involvement and was already accredited. The letters lacked sufficient corroborating evidence to show major significance, and claims about the program's influence on the wider field were not supported by independent evidence from referenced stakeholders.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner did not establish that his 'value-added' changes to an existing degree program constituted an 'original contribution,' as the program predated his involvement and was already accredited. The letters lacked sufficient corroborating evidence to show major significance, and claims about the program's influence on the wider field were not supported by independent evidence from referenced stakeholders.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-12_02_B2203; source_row=25397 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found sufficient documentary evidence that the Petitioner received nationally and internationally recognized awards from gymnastics events at the junior level, withdrawing the Director's determination on this issue.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found sufficient documentary evidence that the Petitioner received nationally and internationally recognized awards from gymnastics events at the junior level, withdrawing the Director's determination on this issue.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-12_01_B2203; source_row=25389 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO rejected the FIG membership claim for lack of evidence that FIG requires outstanding achievements of members, but found that selection to the Great Britain national gymnastics team satisfies the criterion because the national governing body constitutes a recognized national expert in the discipline.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO rejected the FIG membership claim for lack of evidence that FIG requires outstanding achievements of members, but found that selection to the Great Britain national gymnastics team satisfies the criterion because the national governing body constitutes a recognized national expert in the discipline.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-12_01_B2203; source_row=25390 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination – sustained national or international acclaim
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in the alternative that the record does not support a finding of sustained acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in the alternative that the record does not support a finding of sustained acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-12_01_B2203; source_row=25394 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found conflicting evidence that the award was previously granted at the state and local level, that a new national-level award was only recently launched (post-dating the Petitioner's 2011 award), and that recognition for the award did not extend beyond the receiving organizations.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found conflicting evidence that the award was previously granted at the state and local level, that a new national-level award was only recently launched (post-dating the Petitioner's 2011 award), and that recognition for the award did not extend beyond the receiving organizations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-11_02_B2203; source_row=25384 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c