Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 13451–13460
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot established
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Awards
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
The evidence suggests the award is given for excellence in the field, but the record does not establish that it is nationally or internationally recognized. Website traffic data did not indicate widespread national or international viewership.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The evidence suggests the award is given for excellence in the field, but the record does not establish that it is nationally or internationally recognized. Website traffic data did not indicate widespread national or international viewership.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-02_02_B2203; source_row=25317 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The tax return was only partially translated, rendering it impossible to meaningfully evaluate his remuneration. Additionally, without filing information, the figures could not be verified as accurately reported. The salary surveys also did not clearly indicate whether figures were comparable in nature or geographically appropriate.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The tax return was only partially translated, rendering it impossible to meaningfully evaluate his remuneration. Additionally, without filing information, the figures could not be verified as accurately reported. The salary surveys also did not clearly indicate whether figures were comparable in nature or geographically appropriate.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-02_02_B2203; source_row=25322 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The articles were about topics relating to the fitness industry and included opinions from multiple experts, not primarily about the Petitioner. AAO agreed with the Director that this criterion was not met.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The articles were about topics relating to the fitness industry and included opinions from multiple experts, not primarily about the Petitioner. AAO agreed with the Director that this criterion was not met.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-02_02_B2203; source_row=25318 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The record includes several articles authored by the Petitioner providing professional business advice to gym owners, appearing in recognized fitness trade publications.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The record includes several articles authored by the Petitioner providing professional business advice to gym owners, appearing in recognized fitness trade publications.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-02_02_B2203; source_row=25320 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to reach a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three qualifying criteria. AAO noted in dicta that the record does not support the required sustained acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three qualifying criteria. AAO noted in dicta that the record does not support the required sustained acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-02_02_B2203; source_row=25323 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner submitted a letter confirming that he helped select speakers and served as a judge on a panel at a Brazil trade show for three consecutive years.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner submitted a letter confirming that he helped select speakers and served as a judge on a panel at a Brazil trade show for three consecutive years.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-02_02_B2203; source_row=25319 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Five years of qualifying experience per labor certification
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found independently (not addressed by the Director) that the Beneficiary's claimed qualifying experience was insufficient. Her job with the Petitioner lasted less than three years, and her prior employment as a customer relations assistant/teller bore little resemblance to the required roles of controller, financial analyst, or market analyst.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found independently (not addressed by the Director) that the Beneficiary's claimed qualifying experience was insufficient. Her job with the Petitioner lasted less than three years, and her prior employment as a customer relations assistant/teller bore little resemblance to the required roles of controller, financial analyst, or market analyst.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-28_01_B5203; source_row=25316 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Ability to pay proffered wages for all I-140 beneficiaries
Why AAO was not persuaded
Even on appeal, the Petitioner still had not submitted documentary evidence of the yearly wages paid to its I-140 beneficiaries since the priority date, making it impossible to determine the total proffered wage obligation. The failure to submit requested evidence precludes a material line of inquiry under 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(14).
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Even on appeal, the Petitioner still had not submitted documentary evidence of the yearly wages paid to its I-140 beneficiaries since the priority date, making it impossible to determine the total proffered wage obligation. The failure to submit requested evidence precludes a material line of inquiry under 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(14).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-28_01_B5203; source_row=25315 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that the major English-language articles (Huffington Post, Outside, CNBC) were not about the Petitioner but about the race or the team. The Bem-estar article was about him but lacked a publication date and sufficient evidence of being major media. Other Brazilian articles also lacked evidence of constituting major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the major English-language articles (Huffington Post, Outside, CNBC) were not about the Petitioner but about the race or the team. The Bem-estar article was about him but lacked a publication date and sufficient evidence of being major media. Other Brazilian articles also lacked evidence of constituting major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-27_01_B2203; source_row=25310 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that competing in and winning an ocean rowing event is not akin to an original athletic contribution of major significance. The letters praised the Petitioner's achievement and athletic ability but did not explain how his participation was an original contribution to the sport or had a significant impact on rowing.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that competing in and winning an ocean rowing event is not akin to an original athletic contribution of major significance. The letters praised the Petitioner's achievement and athletic ability but did not explain how his participation was an original contribution to the sport or had a significant impact on rowing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-27_01_B2203; source_row=25311 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c