Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 13471–13480
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot established
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
Two articles were about the Beneficiary but the Petitioner failed to show that Business Insider or Yahoo Finance qualify as major media by not providing comparative circulation data. Two other articles merely quoted the Beneficiary and were not about him, which does not satisfy the criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Two articles were about the Beneficiary but the Petitioner failed to show that Business Insider or Yahoo Finance qualify as major media by not providing comparative circulation data. Two other articles merely quoted the Beneficiary and were not about him, which does not satisfy the criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-25_02_B2203; source_row=25291 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
high salary or other significantly high remuneration in relation to others in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
The record contains inconsistent salary figures and does not establish the Beneficiary's actual base salary. Even if the salary were established, the Petitioner used DOL wage data for economists rather than for trade and diplomatic relations experts, failing to show the salary is high relative to others in the Beneficiary's actual field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record contains inconsistent salary figures and does not establish the Beneficiary's actual base salary. Even if the salary were established, the Petitioner used DOL wage data for economists rather than for trade and diplomatic relations experts, failing to show the salary is high relative to others in the Beneficiary's actual field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-25_02_B2203; source_row=25295 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that several submitted articles were not about the Petitioner, others lacked required author attribution, and the remaining articles were not shown to be published in professional, major trade, or major media outlets. SimilarWeb statistics for Independent.ie were insufficient to establish that site as a major medium.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that several submitted articles were not about the Petitioner, others lacked required author attribution, and the remaining articles were not shown to be published in professional, major trade, or major media outlets. SimilarWeb statistics for Independent.ie were insufficient to establish that site as a major medium.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-25_01_B2203; source_row=25285 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherPhD
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed with the Director that the evidence was insufficient. The Beneficiary's graduate research, modest citation record, performance review characterizing him as a developing new engineer, and employee awards did not collectively demonstrate a record of success in process engineering or that his work has been an impetus for progress in the field.…
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the evidence was insufficient. The Beneficiary's graduate research, modest citation record, performance review characterizing him as a developing new engineer, and employee awards did not collectively demonstrate a record of success in process engineering or that his work has been an impetus for progress in the field. Academic awards also lacked selection criteria and were in chemistry rather than process engineering.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-25_01_B5203; source_row=25289 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherPhD
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew the Director's determination on this prong and conducted its own analysis, finding that while the Beneficiary's process engineering work may have substantial merit, the Petitioner failed to demonstrate its national importance.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's determination on this prong and conducted its own analysis, finding that while the Beneficiary's process engineering work may have substantial merit, the Petitioner failed to demonstrate its national importance. The Petitioner's evidence of the employer's overall economic impact did not show that those effects were attributable to the Beneficiary's specific proposed endeavor, and the record did not show broader implications for the manufacturing industry or original innovations beyond internal company work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-25_01_B5203; source_row=25288 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit but found it lacks national importance because its impact would be limited to the Petitioner's employer, clients, and stakeholders, with no evidence of broader implications to the field or substantial positive economic effects or U.S. job creation.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit but found it lacks national importance because its impact would be limited to the Petitioner's employer, clients, and stakeholders, with no evidence of broader implications to the field or substantial positive economic effects or U.S. job creation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-25_02_B5203; source_row=25297 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
authorship of scholarly articles in the field, in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why the evidence was persuasive
The record includes sufficient evidence that the Beneficiary's Brookings Institute book chapter and Atlantic Council policy report constitute scholarly articles in professional publications, satisfying this criterion.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The record includes sufficient evidence that the Beneficiary's Brookings Institute book chapter and Atlantic Council policy report constitute scholarly articles in professional publications, satisfying this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-25_02_B2203; source_row=25293 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role
What the decision said
AAO reserved the leading or critical role criterion without reaching it because the Petitioner could not satisfy the minimum three-criteria threshold regardless of the outcome on this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved the leading or critical role criterion without reaching it because the Petitioner could not satisfy the minimum three-criteria threshold regardless of the outcome on this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-25_01_B2203; source_row=25287 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO reserved the judging criterion without reaching it because the Petitioner could not satisfy the minimum three-criteria threshold regardless of the outcome on this criterion.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved the judging criterion without reaching it because the Petitioner could not satisfy the minimum three-criteria threshold regardless of the outcome on this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-25_01_B2203; source_row=25286 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c