Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Sufficiency of NOIR evidence supporting revocation
Why AAO was not persuaded
The NOIR was defective because it did not cite the specific derogatory evidence (the president's statement) that the position had been filled, did not specify when the position became unavailable, and thus failed to satisfy Estime's requirement that an NOIR include a specific statement of the supporting evidence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The NOIR was defective because it did not cite the specific derogatory evidence (the president's statement) that the position had been filled, did not specify when the position became unavailable, and thus failed to satisfy Estime's requirement that an NOIR include a specific statement of the supporting evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-19_01_B5203; source_row=25259 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner submitted only its 2015 federal tax return, but the priority date is January 12, 2016, and there is no evidence demonstrating the Petitioner's ability to pay the proffered wage of $59,696 in 2016 as required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2).
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner submitted only its 2015 federal tax return, but the priority date is January 12, 2016, and there is no evidence demonstrating the Petitioner's ability to pay the proffered wage of $59,696 in 2016 as required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-19_01_B5203; source_row=25260 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the reference letters, citation counts (including self-citations), peer review activities, two email inquiries, and grant funding (where professors were the PIs) insufficient to show a record of success or interest from relevant parties. The Petitioner did not show his work has served as an impetus for progress or generated substantial discourse in the field.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the reference letters, citation counts (including self-citations), peer review activities, two email inquiries, and grant funding (where professors were the PIs) insufficient to show a record of success or interest from relevant parties. The Petitioner did not show his work has served as an impetus for progress or generated substantial discourse in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-18_01_B5203; source_row=25257 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed with the Director that the proposed endeavor has substantial merit and national importance based on dissemination of research through engineering journals and conferences.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the proposed endeavor has substantial merit and national importance based on dissemination of research through engineering journals and conferences.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-18_01_B5203; source_row=25256 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO concluded that while the Petitioner demonstrated sustained acclaim as an athlete through 2014, his coaching career was primarily at a regional level, and the evidence did not show he had sustained his athletic acclaim into his coaching career or that he was among the small percentage at the very top of the field as a coach.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded that while the Petitioner demonstrated sustained acclaim as an athlete through 2014, his coaching career was primarily at a regional level, and the evidence did not show he had sustained his athletic acclaim into his coaching career or that he was among the small percentage at the very top of the field as a coach.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-13_03_B2203; source_row=25255 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that while the Beneficiary achieved considerable success as a food industry entrepreneur, the submitted letters and media articles did not establish that his contributions rose to the level of major significance in the field as a whole.…
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that while the Beneficiary achieved considerable success as a food industry entrepreneur, the submitted letters and media articles did not establish that his contributions rose to the level of major significance in the field as a whole. Articles noted competitors in the same space and did not document a remarkable industry-wide impact, and the testimonial letters were too conclusory and hyperbolic to be probative.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-13_02_B2203; source_row=25248 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO agreed with the Director that company-level awards were not the Beneficiary's personal awards. As to the CEO of the Year award, the AAO found the award certificate, blog post, and general information about the awarding entity were insufficient to establish national or international recognition for excellence.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed with the Director that company-level awards were not the Beneficiary's personal awards. As to the CEO of the Year award, the AAO found the award certificate, blog post, and general information about the awarding entity were insufficient to establish national or international recognition for excellence. As to the Forbes recognition, the AAO found it was not a 'prize or award' within the plain meaning of the regulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-13_02_B2203; source_row=25245 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that employment with one entity and serving as an authorized representative of another are not comparable to qualifying memberships, and the Petitioner did not show the criterion does not readily apply to his occupation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that employment with one entity and serving as an authorized representative of another are not comparable to qualifying memberships, and the Petitioner did not show the criterion does not readily apply to his occupation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-13_01_B2203; source_row=25240 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c