Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
EB-1Aprocedural or otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
procedural or other
Motion to Reopen Requirements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's new evidence relates to the Director's initial denial rather than the grounds for the AAO's summary dismissal. The materials do not demonstrate that the Petitioner's appeal identified its legal or factual basis, and thus do not satisfy the requirements for a motion to reopen.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's new evidence relates to the Director's initial denial rather than the grounds for the AAO's summary dismissal. The materials do not demonstrate that the Petitioner's appeal identified its legal or factual basis, and thus do not satisfy the requirements for a motion to reopen.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-12_01_B2203; source_row=25225 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1Aprocedural or otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
procedural or other
Motion to Reconsider Requirements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner did not indicate that the AAO's summary dismissal was based on an incorrect application of law or policy, nor did he show the decision was incorrect based on the record at the time.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not indicate that the AAO's summary dismissal was based on an incorrect application of law or policy, nor did he show the decision was incorrect based on the record at the time.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-12_01_B2203; source_row=25226 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO had previously found on appeal that the Petitioner satisfied criterion vii regarding display at artistic exhibitions or showcases, and this finding was not disturbed on motion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO had previously found on appeal that the Petitioner satisfied criterion vii regarding display at artistic exhibitions or showcases, and this finding was not disturbed on motion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-12_03_B2203; source_row=25232 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the cumulative evidence insufficient: the Beneficiary's judging experience was limited and not shown to place her at the top of the field; her eight articles from 2009–2015 garnered only a few dozen citations with four receiving none; she published nothing in four years; reference letters made broad assertions without evidence of widespread acclaim; and media coverage of her research did not even name her.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the cumulative evidence insufficient: the Beneficiary's judging experience was limited and not shown to place her at the top of the field; her eight articles from 2009–2015 garnered only a few dozen citations with four receiving none; she published nothing in four years; reference letters made broad assertions without evidence of widespread acclaim; and media coverage of her research did not even name her. The record showed progression toward the top rather than already being at the top.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-11_02_B2203; source_row=25218 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The letters did not contain detailed information demonstrating a leading or critical role overall for any of the organizations, did not establish how individual performances reflected an overall leading or critical role, and the Petitioner failed to establish that any of the organizations enjoy a distinguished reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The letters did not contain detailed information demonstrating a leading or critical role overall for any of the organizations, did not establish how individual performances reflected an overall leading or critical role, and the Petitioner failed to establish that any of the organizations enjoy a distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-11_01_B2203; source_row=25212 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner presented evidence of receipt of the awards but failed to demonstrate their national or international recognition for excellence in the field. A letter confirming receipt of the Silver Album did not show the field's view of the award, and no corroborating evidence supported claims about the APA Plaque or Trophy Award being nationally or internationally recognized.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner presented evidence of receipt of the awards but failed to demonstrate their national or international recognition for excellence in the field. A letter confirming receipt of the Silver Album did not show the field's view of the award, and no corroborating evidence supported claims about the APA Plaque or Trophy Award being nationally or internationally recognized.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-11_01_B2203; source_row=25208 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner did not demonstrate that winning a folk festival contest constitutes an outstanding achievement consistent with this criterion, did not provide the bylaws of Maestro International, and did not show that membership is judged by recognized national or international experts.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not demonstrate that winning a folk festival contest constitutes an outstanding achievement consistent with this criterion, did not provide the bylaws of Maestro International, and did not show that membership is judged by recognized national or international experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-11_01_B2203; source_row=25209 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The recommendation letters confirmed performances and recordings and praised the Petitioner's skills, but did not establish how those contributions were viewed by the field as original contributions of major significance, did not explain the unusual influence of her work on the overall field, and relied on conclusory and hyperbolic language.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The recommendation letters confirmed performances and recordings and praised the Petitioner's skills, but did not establish how those contributions were viewed by the field as original contributions of major significance, did not explain the unusual influence of her work on the overall field, and relied on conclusory and hyperbolic language.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-11_01_B2203; source_row=25211 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c