Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 13571–13580

NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

five years of qualifying experience in job offered or alternate occupations

Why AAO was not persuaded

The employer documents do not describe the Beneficiary's duties or proficiencies as required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1); the co-worker affidavit is unreliable and copies the labor cert duties verbatim; and inconsistent job titles and the absence of HTML proficiency further undermine the claim.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The employer documents do not describe the Beneficiary's duties or proficiencies as required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1); the co-worker affidavit is unreliable and copies the labor cert duties verbatim; and inconsistent job titles and the absence of HTML proficiency further undermine the claim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-06_02_B5203; source_row=25186
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

bachelor's degree in field of study required by labor certification

Why AAO was not persuaded

The new evaluation does not detail coursework or compare it to a U.S. computer science curriculum, and does not reconcile its conclusion with the prior evaluation that equated the degree to Information Technology.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The new evaluation does not detail coursework or compare it to a U.S. computer science curriculum, and does not reconcile its conclusion with the prior evaluation that equated the degree to Information Technology.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-06_02_B5203; source_row=25185
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherPhD

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the article was about the Petitioner's research, not about the Petitioner himself (he is listed only as a contact), and that the Petitioner failed to establish Simulia Community News or the company website qualifies as a professional or major trade publication or other major medium.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the article was about the Petitioner's research, not about the Petitioner himself (he is listed only as a contact), and that the Petitioner failed to establish Simulia Community News or the company website qualifies as a professional or major trade publication or other major medium.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-05_02_B2203; source_row=25169
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherPhD

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the IACSIT membership argument untimely (submitted letter dated December 2018, after February 2018 filing date) and substantively insufficient because IACSIT senior membership is based solely on holding a doctoral degree, not on outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the IACSIT membership argument untimely (submitted letter dated December 2018, after February 2018 filing date) and substantively insufficient because IACSIT senior membership is based solely on holding a doctoral degree, not on outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-05_02_B2203; source_row=25168
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherPhD

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging the work of others

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO withdrew the Director's finding, concluding that the email submitted was only a reminder to complete reviews, not proof that the Petitioner actually completed paper reviews. No corroborating evidence showed how many or which papers the Petitioner reviewed.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding, concluding that the email submitted was only a reminder to complete reviews, not proof that the Petitioner actually completed paper reviews. No corroborating evidence showed how many or which papers the Petitioner reviewed.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-05_02_B2203; source_row=25170
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established

Case facts

Computer Science / AIEngineerMaster’s

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role

Why AAO was not persuaded

Letters were conclusory and lacked corroborating evidence of the claimed revenue impacts or other outcomes; no evidence established that any of the organizations enjoy a distinguished reputation; and examples showed importance to the employer's team rather than significant importance to the outcome of the establishment's activities overall.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Letters were conclusory and lacked corroborating evidence of the claimed revenue impacts or other outcomes; no evidence established that any of the organizations enjoy a distinguished reputation; and examples showed importance to the employer's team rather than significant importance to the outcome of the establishment's activities overall.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-05_03_B2203; source_row=25179
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot established

Case facts

Computer Science / AIEngineerMaster’s

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material

Why AAO was not persuaded

Most articles were about the Beneficiary's employers rather than about the Beneficiary himself. Articles that were about the Beneficiary were published in outlets not established as major media or professional trade publications; one lacked a required author credit. Self-promotional publisher materials were insufficient to establish major media status.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Most articles were about the Beneficiary's employers rather than about the Beneficiary himself. Articles that were about the Beneficiary were published in outlets not established as major media or professional trade publications; one lacked a required author credit. Self-promotional publisher materials were insufficient to establish major media status.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-05_03_B2203; source_row=25176
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot established

Case facts

Computer Science / AIEngineerMaster’s

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership

Why AAO was not persuaded

None of the asserted memberships demonstrated that outstanding achievements in software engineering were required. Founders Network and IVY had criteria unrelated to outstanding field achievements; Hive Global and HPAIR offered training programs or conferences rather than organizational membership.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
None of the asserted memberships demonstrated that outstanding achievements in software engineering were required. Founders Network and IVY had criteria unrelated to outstanding field achievements; Hive Global and HPAIR offered training programs or conferences rather than organizational membership.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-05_03_B2203; source_row=25175
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established

Case facts

Computer Science / AIEngineerMaster’s

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions

Why AAO was not persuaded

The provisional patent was not demonstrated to be of major significance in the field; letters from employers described contributions to specific companies rather than the field broadly; publications on websites like medium.com lacked evidence of major significance; and no evidence showed wide implementation or remarkable field-wide impact.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
The provisional patent was not demonstrated to be of major significance in the field; letters from employers described contributions to specific companies rather than the field broadly; publications on websites like medium.com lacked evidence of major significance; and no evidence showed wide implementation or remarkable field-wide impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-05_03_B2203; source_row=25178
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot established

Case facts

Computer Science / AIEngineerMaster’s

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

awards

Why AAO was not persuaded

None of the hackathon placements, competition wins, scholarships, or other recognitions were sufficiently documented as nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence in software engineering. Many lacked corroborating documentation, pertained to fields other than software engineering, or reflected placement in qualifying rounds rather than award receipt.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
None of the hackathon placements, competition wins, scholarships, or other recognitions were sufficiently documented as nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence in software engineering. Many lacked corroborating documentation, pertained to fields other than software engineering, or reflected placement in qualifying rounds rather than award receipt.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-05_03_B2203; source_row=25174
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment