Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 13591–13600
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Civil / Structural Engineering
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien in professional or major media
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO previously found on appeal that criterion (iii) was met; this finding was maintained on motion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO previously found on appeal that criterion (iii) was met; this finding was maintained on motion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-05_01_B2203; source_row=25159 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AIEngineerMaster’s
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary
Why the evidence was persuasive
The submitted compensation evidence, including geographic and position-appropriate salary surveys, was sufficient to establish that the Beneficiary commanded a high salary relative to other software engineers. AAO withdrew the Director's contrary finding.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The submitted compensation evidence, including geographic and position-appropriate salary surveys, was sufficient to establish that the Beneficiary commanded a high salary relative to other software engineers. AAO withdrew the Director's contrary finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-05_03_B2203; source_row=25180 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AIEngineerMaster’s
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of three criteria. AAO noted in the alternative that the aggregate record does not support sustained acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of three criteria. AAO noted in the alternative that the aggregate record does not support sustained acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-05_03_B2203; source_row=25181 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The record contains evidence of the Beneficiary serving as a judge for an engineering competition at a university and reviewing technical book chapters for software engineering texts. AAO agreed with the Director.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The record contains evidence of the Beneficiary serving as a judge for an engineering competition at a university and reviewing technical book chapters for software engineering texts. AAO agreed with the Director.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-05_03_B2203; source_row=25177 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical31 citations
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that documentation from CDC, WHO, and other health organizations, along with letters of support discussing the potential benefits of the Petitioner's proposed neuropathology research, established both substantial merit and national importance. Clinical activities were excluded from the first-prong finding as lacking national importance beyond individual patient care.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that documentation from CDC, WHO, and other health organizations, along with letters of support discussing the potential benefits of the Petitioner's proposed neuropathology research, established both substantial merit and national importance. Clinical activities were excluded from the first-prong finding as lacking national importance beyond individual patient care.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-05_01_B5203; source_row=25165 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
High salary or other significantly high remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's earnings were close to average for a coach in his area with his level of experience. The salary data he submitted showed his earnings near or below the national average for head gymnastics coaches, not at a high or significantly high level.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's earnings were close to average for a coach in his area with his level of experience. The salary data he submitted showed his earnings near or below the national average for head gymnastics coaches, not at a high or significantly high level.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-04_01_B2203; source_row=25151 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
USA Gymnastics professional membership requires course completion and background checks, not outstanding achievements, and is open to any compliant applicant. The FIG Brevet Level 2 credential requires passing examinations but does not require prospective judges to demonstrate outstanding achievements as a prerequisite.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
USA Gymnastics professional membership requires course completion and background checks, not outstanding achievements, and is open to any compliant applicant. The FIG Brevet Level 2 credential requires passing examinations but does not require prospective judges to demonstrate outstanding achievements as a prerequisite.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-04_01_B2203; source_row=25147 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
Published material about the individual in major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
Most of the submitted articles were about competitions or teams rather than about the Petitioner himself, several lacked identified authors, several were only partially translated, and one newspaper lacked evidence of qualifying as major media. Local U.S. newspaper coverage was not claimed or shown to constitute major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Most of the submitted articles were about competitions or teams rather than about the Petitioner himself, several lacked identified authors, several were only partially translated, and one newspaper lacked evidence of qualifying as major media. Local U.S. newspaper coverage was not claimed or shown to constitute major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-04_01_B2203; source_row=25148 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Major awardNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Major award
Major internationally recognized award
Why AAO was not persuaded
There is no comparable evidence provision for the one-time major internationally recognized award pathway. Awards won by athletes coached by the Petitioner cannot satisfy this requirement under a comparable evidence theory.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
There is no comparable evidence provision for the one-time major internationally recognized award pathway. Awards won by athletes coached by the Petitioner cannot satisfy this requirement under a comparable evidence theory.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-04_01_B2203; source_row=25145 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
Awards received by coached athletes do not satisfy the plain language requiring the petitioner himself to be the recipient. The 2018 Coach of the Year award was received after the December 2015 filing date. The national coaching awards lacked background information on criteria, number of recipients, or national significance. Letters about athletic achievements were inconsistent and unaccompanied by documentary evidence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Awards received by coached athletes do not satisfy the plain language requiring the petitioner himself to be the recipient. The 2018 Coach of the Year award was received after the December 2015 filing date. The national coaching awards lacked background information on criteria, number of recipients, or national significance. Letters about athletic achievements were inconsistent and unaccompanied by documentary evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-02-04_01_B2203; source_row=25146 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c