Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 13661–13670
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO disagreed with the Director: provincial Chinese newspapers lacked significant national or international distribution; the TV appearance was on a local Chinese-language station; the online article had only 349 page views; the blog posts were not major media and one was a promotional press release; and The Straits Times article was not about the Petitioner.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director: provincial Chinese newspapers lacked significant national or international distribution; the TV appearance was on a local Chinese-language station; the online article had only 349 page views; the blog posts were not major media and one was a promotional press release; and The Straits Times article was not about the Petitioner.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-24_02_B2203; source_row=25080 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim at very top of field
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed the Petitioner failed final merits, finding that his prizes were for young/student musicians only, his performances were in smaller venues or youth settings, his principal cello roles were in student/youth orchestras excluding the most experienced professionals, his upcoming U.S.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the Petitioner failed final merits, finding that his prizes were for young/student musicians only, his performances were in smaller venues or youth settings, his principal cello roles were in student/youth orchestras excluding the most experienced professionals, his upcoming U.S. work was short-term and not indicative of top-level acclaim, and expert praise did not show recognition beyond those who worked directly with him.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-24_02_B2203; source_row=25085 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Ability to pay proffered wage from priority date onward
What the decision said
AAO notes that the record lacks post-priority-date W-2s and no annual reports, tax returns, or audited financial statements for the Petitioner were submitted. AAO remands for the Director to request the required evidence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO notes that the record lacks post-priority-date W-2s and no annual reports, tax returns, or audited financial statements for the Petitioner were submitted. AAO remands for the Director to request the required evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-24_01_B5203; source_row=25077 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Applicability of marriage fraud bar under section 204(c)
What the decision said
AAO declines to reach the merits because the Director never reviewed the relevant documentation, and remands for the Director to evaluate the full evidentiary record on whether section 204(c) applies.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declines to reach the merits because the Director never reviewed the relevant documentation, and remands for the Director to evaluate the full evidentiary record on whether section 204(c) applies.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-24_01_B5203; source_row=25076 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the threshold evidentiary criteria, but noted in dicta that the record would not support a finding of sustained acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the threshold evidentiary criteria, but noted in dicta that the record would not support a finding of sustained acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-24_01_B2203; source_row=25075 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO disagreed with the Director, finding that the Petitioner's documented service as a chief judge or chief referee with authority to adjudicate final competition results goes beyond simple rule enforcement and satisfies the plain language of the judging criterion.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director, finding that the Petitioner's documented service as a chief judge or chief referee with authority to adjudicate final competition results goes beyond simple rule enforcement and satisfies the plain language of the judging criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-24_01_B2203; source_row=25072 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
What the decision said
AAO found the claim was abandoned because the Petitioner did not contest the Director's finding on appeal, and the initial submission did not specify what the Petitioner's role was.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the claim was abandoned because the Petitioner did not contest the Director's finding on appeal, and the initial submission did not specify what the Petitioner's role was.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-24_01_B2203; source_row=25074 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed with the Director that this criterion is met, but noted that the Petitioner's two most recent international results were disqualifications, and he has not competed in IWF events without disqualification since 2011.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that this criterion is met, but noted that the Petitioner's two most recent international results were disqualifications, and he has not competed in IWF events without disqualification since 2011.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-24_01_B2203; source_row=25069 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c