Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to reach a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three evidentiary criteria, but noted in dicta that the record does not demonstrate sustained acclaim or placement at the top of the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to reach a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three evidentiary criteria, but noted in dicta that the record does not demonstrate sustained acclaim or placement at the top of the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-22_02_B2203; source_row=25056 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration
What the decision said
AAO reserved this criterion for the same reason as criterion (viii): even if credited, two satisfied criteria are insufficient to meet the threshold of three, so further discussion cannot alter the outcome.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved this criterion for the same reason as criterion (viii): even if credited, two satisfied criteria are insufficient to meet the threshold of three, so further discussion cannot alter the outcome.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-22_03_B2203; source_row=25059 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
What the decision said
AAO reserved this criterion because even crediting it along with criterion (ix), the Petitioner still could not reach the required three criteria after failing criterion (i), making further discussion unable to alter the outcome.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved this criterion because even crediting it along with criterion (ix), the Petitioner still could not reach the required three criteria after failing criterion (i), making further discussion unable to alter the outcome.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-22_03_B2203; source_row=25058 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner met the scholarly articles criterion, as the record showed authorship of articles published in multiple peer-reviewed journals.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner met the scholarly articles criterion, as the record showed authorship of articles published in multiple peer-reviewed journals.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-22_01_B2203; source_row=25047 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The record lacked original untranslated foreign-language documents for the Cultural and Artistic Society correspondence, making authenticity unverifiable. Even if considered, the translations contained inconsistent descriptions of membership criteria.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record lacked original untranslated foreign-language documents for the Cultural and Artistic Society correspondence, making authenticity unverifiable. Even if considered, the translations contained inconsistent descriptions of membership criteria. For the Choir, neither correspondent provided information about the selection process, and no organizational documents showed outstanding-achievement requirements judged by nationally or internationally recognized experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-17_01_B2203; source_row=25040 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Grand Prix certificate lacked a certified translation and corroborating evidence. The 2016 first-prize certificate contained an unresolved inconsistency because the Petitioner would have been ineligible for that age-restricted category. The acknowledgement certificates reflected participation in cultural events rather than awards for excellence as a clarinet player, and lacked evidence of national recognition.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Grand Prix certificate lacked a certified translation and corroborating evidence. The 2016 first-prize certificate contained an unresolved inconsistency because the Petitioner would have been ineligible for that age-restricted category. The acknowledgement certificates reflected participation in cultural events rather than awards for excellence as a clarinet player, and lacked evidence of national recognition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-17_01_B2203; source_row=25039 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
eligibility for immigrant visa in all respects, including predecessor's ability to pay
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO finds the Petitioner submitted no regulatory-prescribed evidence of the predecessor's ability to pay the proffered wage from the 2011 priority date through the July 2015 transfer date. The vice president's letter was written on behalf of the Petitioner, not the predecessor, so it does not establish the predecessor's continuing ability to pay.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO finds the Petitioner submitted no regulatory-prescribed evidence of the predecessor's ability to pay the proffered wage from the 2011 priority date through the July 2015 transfer date. The vice president's letter was written on behalf of the Petitioner, not the predecessor, so it does not establish the predecessor's continuing ability to pay.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-17_01_B5203; source_row=25045 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
transfer and assumption of ownership of predecessor
Why AAO was not persuaded
Although AAO rejects the Director's 'all assets/liabilities' standard, AAO independently finds the first prong unmet because there is no evidence that the full purchase price was paid, the predecessor was administratively dissolved before the second payment was due, and the APA was not shown to be signed by an authorized agent of the predecessor.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Although AAO rejects the Director's 'all assets/liabilities' standard, AAO independently finds the first prong unmet because there is no evidence that the full purchase price was paid, the predecessor was administratively dissolved before the second payment was due, and the APA was not shown to be signed by an authorized agent of the predecessor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-17_01_B5203; source_row=25043 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c