Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
AAO finds the Petitioner has established that the job opportunity offered by the successor is the same as that originally offered on the labor certification.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO finds the Petitioner has established that the job opportunity offered by the successor is the same as that originally offered on the labor certification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-17_01_B5203; source_row=25044 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner failed to establish sustained acclaim: his citation record rests on one heavily-cited article; C&EN coverage was a publisher's own press release; the patent's real-world impact is undemonstrated; expert letters come largely from personal supervisors and lack breadth; and peer review reflects expertise rather than acclaim.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner failed to establish sustained acclaim: his citation record rests on one heavily-cited article; C&EN coverage was a publisher's own press release; the patent's real-world impact is undemonstrated; expert letters come largely from personal supervisors and lack breadth; and peer review reflects expertise rather than acclaim. AAO reserved the Director's secondary finding on prospective benefit as unnecessary to reach.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-16_02_B2203; source_row=25020 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
The recommendation letters did not identify specific original contributions or provide concrete examples of how the Petitioner's work has been of major significance. The letters contained broad, unsupported assertions without the specificity needed to establish major significance in the field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The recommendation letters did not identify specific original contributions or provide concrete examples of how the Petitioner's work has been of major significance. The letters contained broad, unsupported assertions without the specificity needed to establish major significance in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-16_03_B2203; source_row=25024 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
The award application kit showed the award is granted for excellence in the field, but lacked information such as the number of awards granted to show national or international recognition. The expert's letter contained conclusory language mirroring the regulation but provided no additional substantive information about the award's recognition.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The award application kit showed the award is granted for excellence in the field, but lacked information such as the number of awards granted to show national or international recognition. The expert's letter contained conclusory language mirroring the regulation but provided no additional substantive information about the award's recognition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-16_03_B2203; source_row=25021 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner did not provide print circulation statistics or other appropriate evidence establishing that Bukhoroi Oqshomi has high circulation relative to other newspapers, and therefore did not demonstrate it rises to the level of major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not provide print circulation statistics or other appropriate evidence establishing that Bukhoroi Oqshomi has high circulation relative to other newspapers, and therefore did not demonstrate it rises to the level of major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-16_03_B2203; source_row=25023 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The letters from association officials contained language mirroring the regulation but neither the authors nor the Petitioner provided sufficient evidence supporting that the organization requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The letters from association officials contained language mirroring the regulation but neither the authors nor the Petitioner provided sufficient evidence supporting that the organization requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts. No charter or other corroborating evidence was provided, and the claim that Art Experts Council members are recognized national or international experts was unsupported.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-16_03_B2203; source_row=25022 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical12 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew the Director's favorable finding, concluding that while the Petitioner's work shed light on plant pathology issues, the record lacked sufficient objective evidence of major significance.…
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's favorable finding, concluding that while the Petitioner's work shed light on plant pathology issues, the record lacked sufficient objective evidence of major significance. Reference letters were insufficient without corroborating documentary evidence, citation numbers were above average but not demonstrably indicative of major significance, and claims of commercial impact were unsupported by documentary evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-16_05_B2203; source_row=25035 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical12 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew the Director's favorable finding, concluding that while the Petitioner may have played critical roles in individual laboratories, he did not establish those laboratories or universities had distinguished reputations in their own right, and grant participation alone did not show a critical role for the institution as a whole.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's favorable finding, concluding that while the Petitioner may have played critical roles in individual laboratories, he did not establish those laboratories or universities had distinguished reputations in their own right, and grant participation alone did not show a critical role for the institution as a whole.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-16_05_B2203; source_row=25037 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
The 2007 domus design article is about the apartment and its design, not about the Petitioner, and therefore fails the regulatory requirement. Additionally, the circulation evidence did not establish that domus design is major media, though it may qualify as a professional/trade publication. Even if it were, the article is not about the Petitioner.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The 2007 domus design article is about the apartment and its design, not about the Petitioner, and therefore fails the regulatory requirement. Additionally, the circulation evidence did not establish that domus design is major media, though it may qualify as a professional/trade publication. Even if it were, the article is not about the Petitioner.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-16_04_B2203; source_row=25028 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner submitted wage comparisons for fashion designers and photographers rather than interior designers. Because the documented payment of $9,800 was for interior design work, wage comparisons must be to others in interior design, not other fields.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner submitted wage comparisons for fashion designers and photographers rather than interior designers. Because the documented payment of $9,800 was for interior design work, wage comparisons must be to others in interior design, not other fields.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-16_04_B2203; source_row=25029 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c