Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / ClinicalPhysician36 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to formally reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the minimum number of evidentiary criteria at step one, though it noted the record in the aggregate would not support a finding of sustained acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to formally reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the minimum number of evidentiary criteria at step one, though it noted the record in the aggregate would not support a finding of sustained acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-14_01_B2203; source_row=24994 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the Step 1 threshold of three criteria. AAO noted in dicta that the record does not support a finding of sustained acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the Step 1 threshold of three criteria. AAO noted in dicta that the record does not support a finding of sustained acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-14_03_B2203; source_row=25010 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner provided documentary evidence that she has peer-reviewed manuscripts for several journals. AAO agreed with the Director that she fulfilled the requirements of the judging criterion.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner provided documentary evidence that she has peer-reviewed manuscripts for several journals. AAO agreed with the Director that she fulfilled the requirements of the judging criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-14_03_B2203; source_row=25007 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The record contains evidence that the Petitioner has authored scholarly articles published in several journals. AAO agreed with the Director that she fulfilled the scholarly articles criterion.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The record contains evidence that the Petitioner has authored scholarly articles published in several journals. AAO agreed with the Director that she fulfilled the scholarly articles criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-14_03_B2203; source_row=25009 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner fulfilled the scholarly articles criterion based on his authorship of scholarly articles in professional publications.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner fulfilled the scholarly articles criterion based on his authorship of scholarly articles in professional publications.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-14_02_B2203; source_row=25000 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner fulfilled the judging criterion because the record reflects that the Petitioner reviewed papers for journals.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner fulfilled the judging criterion because the record reflects that the Petitioner reviewed papers for journals.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-14_02_B2203; source_row=24999 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The employer letters demonstrated the Petitioner has at least five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in finance, satisfying the regulatory equivalent of a master's degree.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The employer letters demonstrated the Petitioner has at least five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in finance, satisfying the regulatory equivalent of a master's degree.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-14_01_B5203; source_row=24995 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO declined to resolve the ability-to-pay question on the merits because the Director's decision contained internal contradictions regarding the LLC's tax classification. AAO remanded for a new decision after the Director confirms the correct tax classification.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to resolve the ability-to-pay question on the merits because the Director's decision contained internal contradictions regarding the LLC's tax classification. AAO remanded for a new decision after the Director confirms the correct tax classification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-13_01_B5203; source_row=24987 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c