Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
AAO noted in a footnote that the Petitioner does not specifically claim this criterion; while letters and a website printout reference his adjudicator work, the record does not directly document this activity or any specific occasion on which he served in that capacity.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO noted in a footnote that the Petitioner does not specifically claim this criterion; while letters and a website printout reference his adjudicator work, the record does not directly document this activity or any specific occasion on which he served in that capacity.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-09_02_B2203; source_row=24967 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed step one, but noted in the aggregate the record does not support the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed step one, but noted in the aggregate the record does not support the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-09_02_B2203; source_row=24968 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
Final merits determination – sustained national or international acclaim
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold evidentiary requirement of at least three criteria, but noted in passing that the record would not support the required finding.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold evidentiary requirement of at least three criteria, but noted in passing that the record would not support the required finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-09_03_B2203; source_row=24975 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
Published material about the individual in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
Korean-language articles lacked properly certified translations (a single blanket certification did not accompany each document). English-language articles lacked supporting evidence of major/trade publication status. Forbes and Vanity Fair articles were about the series, not the Petitioner. The Who's Who certificate was undated and lacked proof of publication prior to filing.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Korean-language articles lacked properly certified translations (a single blanket certification did not accompany each document). English-language articles lacked supporting evidence of major/trade publication status. Forbes and Vanity Fair articles were about the series, not the Petitioner. The Who's Who certificate was undated and lacked proof of publication prior to filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-09_03_B2203; source_row=24971 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the Petitioner met this criterion based on his actual receipt of the Annie Award, which was well-documented in the record including a photograph of the engraved award and official results. However, his Emmy nomination (not a receipt), and series-level awards (where individual receipt was not proven) did not independently satisfy the criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner met this criterion based on his actual receipt of the Annie Award, which was well-documented in the record including a photograph of the engraved award and official results. However, his Emmy nomination (not a receipt), and series-level awards (where individual receipt was not proven) did not independently satisfy the criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-09_03_B2203; source_row=24970 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
Leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that as founder, owner, and CEO of his animation studios in Korea and the United States, the Petitioner plays a leading role for those organizations, and that the studios have a distinguished reputation evidenced by partnerships with Nickelodeon, DreamWorks, Netflix, and Riot Games. Government appointments and the Nickelodeon series role did not independently satisfy the criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that as founder, owner, and CEO of his animation studios in Korea and the United States, the Petitioner plays a leading role for those organizations, and that the studios have a distinguished reputation evidenced by partnerships with Nickelodeon, DreamWorks, Netflix, and Riot Games. Government appointments and the Nickelodeon series role did not independently satisfy the criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-09_03_B2203; source_row=24973 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO withdrew the director's finding because the record contained only a letter stating the Petitioner became a certified judge in 2015, with no additional evidence of judging credentials and no evidence that she had actually participated as a judge at any competition or event as of the filing date.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the director's finding because the record contained only a letter stating the Petitioner became a certified judge in 2015, with no additional evidence of judging credentials and no evidence that she had actually participated as a judge at any competition or event as of the filing date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-08_02_B2203; source_row=24955 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other10 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed the originally submitted articles were deficient for various reasons but found that the Milenio and Media Tiempo articles submitted on motion, accompanied by full English translations and supporting evidence of their status as major media, satisfied this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the originally submitted articles were deficient for various reasons but found that the Milenio and Media Tiempo articles submitted on motion, accompanied by full English translations and supporting evidence of their status as major media, satisfied this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-08_02_B2203; source_row=24954 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed that mere national team membership or elite-level federation registration does not satisfy the criterion, but found that her membership specifically on the senior Mexican national teams that competed at the Championships in 2009, 2010, and 2011 did satisfy it, based on a detailed explanation of the selection process from the national federation president.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that mere national team membership or elite-level federation registration does not satisfy the criterion, but found that her membership specifically on the senior Mexican national teams that competed at the Championships in 2009, 2010, and 2011 did satisfy it, based on a detailed explanation of the selection process from the national federation president.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-08_02_B2203; source_row=24953 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c