Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 13791–13800
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot established
Case facts
Electrical / Electronic Engineering9 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
Although not required to reach a final merits determination after finding the Petitioner met fewer than three criteria, AAO reviewed the record in the aggregate and found it does not establish sustained national or international acclaim or placement at the very top of the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Although not required to reach a final merits determination after finding the Petitioner met fewer than three criteria, AAO reviewed the record in the aggregate and found it does not establish sustained national or international acclaim or placement at the very top of the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-06_02_B2203; source_row=24930 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Social SciencesPhD14 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The expert and colleague letters were insufficiently specific to establish that the Petitioner's contributions had a major impact on the overall field. Citation counts were not shown to be commensurate with major significance. Conference presentations, research funding, and the app pilot program did not establish widespread field-level influence.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The expert and colleague letters were insufficiently specific to establish that the Petitioner's contributions had a major impact on the overall field. Citation counts were not shown to be commensurate with major significance. Conference presentations, research funding, and the app pilot program did not establish widespread field-level influence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-06_01_B2203; source_row=24923 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO conducted a de novo review of tax returns and Sonegawa totality factors and concluded the Petitioner did not establish ability to pay the $80,000 proffered wage from the 2016 priority date onward.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO conducted a de novo review of tax returns and Sonegawa totality factors and concluded the Petitioner did not establish ability to pay the $80,000 proffered wage from the 2016 priority date onward.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-01-06_01_B5203; source_row=24925 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO affirmed the Director's finding, citing the USCIS Policy Memorandum's definition of scholarly articles as original research or expert writing for learned persons in the field. The Petitioner's articles in Data Driven Investor appear to be blog posts offering general personnel advice to entrepreneurs, not scholarly articles.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed the Director's finding, citing the USCIS Policy Memorandum's definition of scholarly articles as original research or expert writing for learned persons in the field. The Petitioner's articles in Data Driven Investor appear to be blog posts offering general personnel advice to entrepreneurs, not scholarly articles.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-30_01_B2203; source_row=24917 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
While AAO agreed the program is not a course of instruction, the Petitioner failed to submit documentary evidence that he is a member of the program or to establish the membership requirements. Program officials only described him as a participant in events or programs, not a member of an association.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
While AAO agreed the program is not a course of instruction, the Petitioner failed to submit documentary evidence that he is a member of the program or to establish the membership requirements. Program officials only described him as a participant in events or programs, not a member of an association. The Ambassador Program also was not shown to be an independent association with members chosen by national or international experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-30_01_B2203; source_row=24913 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO stated it need not provide a formal final merits determination since the Petitioner failed to meet three criteria, but noted in the aggregate the record does not support a finding of sustained acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO stated it need not provide a formal final merits determination since the Petitioner failed to meet three criteria, but noted in the aggregate the record does not support a finding of sustained acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-30_01_B2203; source_row=24920 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c