Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 13811–13820

EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other20 papers

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed that the Petitioner's more than 15 music awards, accompanied by evidence of national recognition and confirmation of individual receipt, satisfied this criterion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner's more than 15 music awards, accompanied by evidence of national recognition and confirmation of individual receipt, satisfied this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-23_01_B2203; source_row=24901
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other19 papers

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that while the Petitioner had conducted, published, and presented research during training, he had not shown that this work constitutes a record of success or progress sufficient to demonstrate he is well positioned to advance his proposed hematopathology research.…

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that while the Petitioner had conducted, published, and presented research during training, he had not shown that this work constitutes a record of success or progress sufficient to demonstrate he is well positioned to advance his proposed hematopathology research. His citation evidence lacked comparative statistics, his most-cited article was outside his proposed specialty, and his professional memberships did not demonstrate research success or interest from relevant parties.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-20_01_B5203; source_row=24899
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Teletriumf award was received by an entity, not the Petitioner, and the record did not show her role was integral to the award. The films' awards were unsubstantiated or not nationally/internationally recognized. The Football League medal and liberation award were not recognized for excellence in film production.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Teletriumf award was received by an entity, not the Petitioner, and the record did not show her role was integral to the award. The films' awards were unsubstantiated or not nationally/internationally recognized. The Football League medal and liberation award were not recognized for excellence in film production.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-20_01_B2203; source_row=24893
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

Why AAO was not persuaded

The record lacked corroborating evidence that the Petitioner originated the techniques or that they were widely implemented. The letters made broad, unsupported assertions without specifics about major significance or impact on the field.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
The record lacked corroborating evidence that the Petitioner originated the techniques or that they were widely implemented. The letters made broad, unsupported assertions without specifics about major significance or impact on the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-20_01_B2203; source_row=24894
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other19 papers

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed that the Petitioner's proposed hematopathology research has both substantial merit and national importance, given the evidence of blood cancer prevalence and the broader dissemination of research results. Clinical and teaching duties were found to lack national importance as they would not impact the field or healthcare industry more broadly.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner's proposed hematopathology research has both substantial merit and national importance, given the evidence of blood cancer prevalence and the broader dissemination of research results. Clinical and teaching duties were found to lack national importance as they would not impact the field or healthcare industry more broadly.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-20_01_B5203; source_row=24898
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other19 papers

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive job offer requirement

What the decision said

AAO declined to reach the third prong because the Petitioner failed to establish the second prong, making further analysis of the balancing factors unnecessary. AAO also noted that a shortage of workers alone does not demonstrate that waiving labor certification would benefit the United States.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach the third prong because the Petitioner failed to establish the second prong, making further analysis of the balancing factors unnecessary. AAO also noted that a shortage of workers alone does not demonstrate that waiving labor certification would benefit the United States.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-20_01_B5203; source_row=24900
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role for distinguished organizations

Why AAO was not persuaded

The record lacked an organizational structure to establish the leading nature of her role, and the letters lacked sufficiently detailed information or corroborating evidence of the critical impact of her work on the organization's activities.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The record lacked an organizational structure to establish the leading nature of her role, and the letters lacked sufficiently detailed information or corroborating evidence of the critical impact of her work on the organization's activities.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-20_01_B2203; source_row=24896
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

authorship of scholarly articles

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found the published journal article and peer-reviewed book sufficient to satisfy the scholarly articles criterion, and withdrew the Director's contrary finding.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the published journal article and peer-reviewed book sufficient to satisfy the scholarly articles criterion, and withdrew the Director's contrary finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-20_01_B2203; source_row=24895
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

What the decision said

AAO declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet at least three criteria at step one, but noted in dicta that the record does not support the required acclaim.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet at least three criteria at step one, but noted in dicta that the record does not support the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-20_01_B2203; source_row=24897
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established

Case facts

Biomedical / Life Sciences118 citations

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that while the Petitioner's work is original and has added value to the field, the testimonial letters, citation data, commercialization evidence, and publication in high-ranked journals do not collectively demonstrate that his contributions have already had a widespread or major influence on the overall field of biomedical engineering or gene therapy.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that while the Petitioner's work is original and has added value to the field, the testimonial letters, citation data, commercialization evidence, and publication in high-ranked journals do not collectively demonstrate that his contributions have already had a widespread or major influence on the overall field of biomedical engineering or gene therapy.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-19_01_B2203; source_row=24883
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment