Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 13831–13840
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO weighed the totality of evidence including swimming awards, team membership, and media coverage, finding them insufficient to establish sustained national or international acclaim or top-of-field status. The Petitioner's incomplete career documentation, lack of recent competitive results against top swimmers, single team membership from years ago, and limited press coverage did not support extraordinary ability.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO weighed the totality of evidence including swimming awards, team membership, and media coverage, finding them insufficient to establish sustained national or international acclaim or top-of-field status. The Petitioner's incomplete career documentation, lack of recent competitive results against top swimmers, single team membership from years ago, and limited press coverage did not support extraordinary ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-18_02_B2203; source_row=24873 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that the patents establish originality but not major significance in the field; contracts did not demonstrate that they involved the Petitioner's patents or showed broader impact beyond his two companies. Publications lacked evidence of major significance, and recommendation letters were too conclusory and non-specific to demonstrate major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the patents establish originality but not major significance in the field; contracts did not demonstrate that they involved the Petitioner's patents or showed broader impact beyond his two companies. Publications lacked evidence of major significance, and recommendation letters were too conclusory and non-specific to demonstrate major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-18_01_B2203; source_row=24867 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO found that none of the three associations require outstanding achievements of their members as judged by recognized national or international experts. Instead, the membership requirements for NTCFP, GFSTC, and GFPA reflect minimum levels of education, experience, or professional enthusiasm rather than outstanding accomplishments, and none demonstrate that recognized national or international experts judge membership.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that none of the three associations require outstanding achievements of their members as judged by recognized national or international experts. Instead, the membership requirements for NTCFP, GFSTC, and GFPA reflect minimum levels of education, experience, or professional enthusiasm rather than outstanding accomplishments, and none demonstrate that recognized national or international experts judge membership.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-18_01_B2203; source_row=24866 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found IPMA board membership is based on election, not on judgment by recognized national or international experts finding outstanding achievements. CFBACC membership was disregarded because the Petitioner joined after the filing date; moreover, CFBACC bylaws show membership is open to anyone expressing interest and board membership is elected.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found IPMA board membership is based on election, not on judgment by recognized national or international experts finding outstanding achievements. CFBACC membership was disregarded because the Petitioner joined after the filing date; moreover, CFBACC bylaws show membership is open to anyone expressing interest and board membership is elected.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-18_03_B2203; source_row=24874 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner compared her salary to human resource specialists rather than to others at her actual level (partners and heads), and she did not submit independent supporting evidence of comparable salaries. Her uncorroborated self-compiled comparisons lacked probative value.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner compared her salary to human resource specialists rather than to others at her actual level (partners and heads), and she did not submit independent supporting evidence of comparable salaries. Her uncorroborated self-compiled comparisons lacked probative value.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-18_03_B2203; source_row=24878 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the letters lacked specific, detailed information explaining the unusual influence or high impact of the Petitioner's methodology on the overall field, relied on hyperbolic and conclusory language, and in some instances described only prospective or potential impacts rather than established major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the letters lacked specific, detailed information explaining the unusual influence or high impact of the Petitioner's methodology on the overall field, relied on hyperbolic and conclusory language, and in some instances described only prospective or potential impacts rather than established major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-18_03_B2203; source_row=24876 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the Petitioner prepared summaries of candidates based on a methodology and presented them to employers to make hiring decisions, which does not constitute participation as a judge of the work of others as required by this criterion.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner prepared summaries of candidates based on a methodology and presented them to employers to make hiring decisions, which does not constitute participation as a judge of the work of others as required by this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-18_03_B2203; source_row=24875 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that the Petitioner demonstrated membership with the Uzbekistan national team, satisfying the membership criterion, contrary to the Director's finding.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner demonstrated membership with the Uzbekistan national team, satisfying the membership criterion, contrary to the Director's finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-18_02_B2203; source_row=24871 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c