Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 13841–13850
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO affirmed the Director's finding that the Petitioner satisfied the leading or critical role criterion, noting that letters in the record sufficiently showed she performed in critical roles for specific organizations.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed the Director's finding that the Petitioner satisfied the leading or critical role criterion, noting that letters in the record sufficiently showed she performed in critical roles for specific organizations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-18_03_B2203; source_row=24877 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The submitted employer certificates do not satisfy 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1) because neither certificate identifies the writer's title, providing little or no information about the signatory's actual position at the employer. AAO remanded for additional evidence meeting the regulatory requirements.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The submitted employer certificates do not satisfy 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1) because neither certificate identifies the writer's title, providing little or no information about the signatory's actual position at the employer. AAO remanded for additional evidence meeting the regulatory requirements.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-13_01_B5203; source_row=24865 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Educational requirement of the labor certification
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO conducted a de novo review and found that the Beneficiary's educational credentials satisfy the labor certification's educational requirements, withdrawing the Director's contrary finding.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO conducted a de novo review and found that the Beneficiary's educational credentials satisfy the labor certification's educational requirements, withdrawing the Director's contrary finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-13_01_B5203; source_row=24864 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Finance
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner did not submit documentary evidence that other banks implemented his compliance tool; letters showed the approach was shared but not adopted, and the Petitioner failed to meet the secondary evidence rule requirements. The evidence showed importance to his employer but not major significance to the field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner did not submit documentary evidence that other banks implemented his compliance tool; letters showed the approach was shared but not adopted, and the Petitioner failed to meet the secondary evidence rule requirements. The evidence showed importance to his employer but not major significance to the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-12_02_B2203; source_row=24851 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner did not specifically claim this criterion and the record contains no documentation of box office receipts or record/cassette/CD/video sales.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not specifically claim this criterion and the record contains no documentation of box office receipts or record/cassette/CD/video sales.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-12_03_B2203; source_row=24862 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner did not specifically claim this criterion and the record contained only general praise letters that do not demonstrate contributions of major significance in the field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not specifically claim this criterion and the record contained only general praise letters that do not demonstrate contributions of major significance in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-12_03_B2203; source_row=24858 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of the alien's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why AAO was not persuaded
Films and advertisements generally serve a commercial purpose and are not intrinsically artistic exhibitions or showcases. The prospective attendance at a trade show was not shown to constitute an artistic exhibition, and films in pre-production do not yet exist. Additionally, the event occurred after the petition's filing date and cannot establish eligibility as of that date.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Films and advertisements generally serve a commercial purpose and are not intrinsically artistic exhibitions or showcases. The prospective attendance at a trade show was not shown to constitute an artistic exhibition, and films in pre-production do not yet exist. Additionally, the event occurred after the petition's filing date and cannot establish eligibility as of that date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-12_03_B2203; source_row=24859 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The magazine caption was autobiographical and did not constitute coverage about the Petitioner's work in the field; the second magazine was a bank newsletter with no articles about her work. TV appearances in advertisements, a music video, and a talk show were not about her and her work in the field, and the Petitioner did not document the publications' or programs' reach or status as major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The magazine caption was autobiographical and did not constitute coverage about the Petitioner's work in the field; the second magazine was a bank newsletter with no articles about her work. TV appearances in advertisements, a music video, and a talk show were not about her and her work in the field, and the Petitioner did not document the publications' or programs' reach or status as major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-12_03_B2203; source_row=24856 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Medicine / ClinicalFaculty
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO reversed the Director's finding, concluding that the Petitioner did not submit sufficient documentary evidence establishing the distinguished reputation of his employers, that his role as head of a specialized surgical unit was a leading or critical role for the hospital as a whole, or that his unit or the university had a distinguished reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reversed the Director's finding, concluding that the Petitioner did not submit sufficient documentary evidence establishing the distinguished reputation of his employers, that his role as head of a specialized surgical unit was a leading or critical role for the hospital as a whole, or that his unit or the university had a distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-12_01_B2203; source_row=24847 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed that the Petitioner had not met this criterion, finding the financial figures were incomplete, uncorroborated, and internally inconsistent, and the PayScale comparison was deficient due to an insufficient sample size, wrong specialty category, and ambiguous salary interval and terminology.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner had not met this criterion, finding the financial figures were incomplete, uncorroborated, and internally inconsistent, and the PayScale comparison was deficient due to an insufficient sample size, wrong specialty category, and ambiguous salary interval and terminology.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-12_01_B2203; source_row=24848 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c