Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 13851–13860
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Finance
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner had not demonstrated sustained national or international acclaim. His employer prominence did not establish field-wide acclaim, his judging arose from open volunteer applications rather than personal invitations signifying recognition, and the record lacked evidence of the awarding entities' reputations beyond self-promotional materials.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner had not demonstrated sustained national or international acclaim. His employer prominence did not establish field-wide acclaim, his judging arose from open volunteer applications rather than personal invitations signifying recognition, and the record lacked evidence of the awarding entities' reputations beyond self-promotional materials.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-12_02_B2203; source_row=24854 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that the certificate presented 'for judging' the Business Awards, on its face, implies the judging had already taken place. However, AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner had not shown actual participation in the second awards program, as no certificate of completion was submitted.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the certificate presented 'for judging' the Business Awards, on its face, implies the judging had already taken place. However, AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner had not shown actual participation in the second awards program, as no certificate of completion was submitted.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-12_02_B2203; source_row=24850 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold initial evidence requirement of at least three criteria.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold initial evidence requirement of at least three criteria.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-12_03_B2203; source_row=24863 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner failed to establish national or international recognition for the pageant title. On appeal, the Petitioner merely repeated the assertion without providing new information.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner failed to establish national or international recognition for the pageant title. On appeal, the Petitioner merely repeated the assertion without providing new information.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-12_03_B2203; source_row=24855 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that while the Petitioner worked for important clients, she did not show her advertisement appearances significantly contributed to the success or standing of those clients.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that while the Petitioner worked for important clients, she did not show her advertisement appearances significantly contributed to the success or standing of those clients.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-12_03_B2203; source_row=24860 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration relative to others in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner did not specifically claim this criterion and submitted no comparative evidence to show her fees were high in relation to others in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not specifically claim this criterion and submitted no comparative evidence to show her fees were high in relation to others in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-12_03_B2203; source_row=24861 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner satisfied this criterion through his participation in juries to evaluate the work of graduate-level medical students.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner satisfied this criterion through his participation in juries to evaluate the work of graduate-level medical students.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-12_01_B2203; source_row=24846 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / ClinicalFaculty
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the initial evidence threshold, but noted the record in aggregate does not support the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the initial evidence threshold, but noted the record in aggregate does not support the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-12_01_B2203; source_row=24849 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner failed to demonstrate that the role of martial arts judge involves evaluating competitors' work or skills rather than merely enforcing rules and ensuring sportsmanlike competition. No evidence such as official competition rules or documentation of awarding points was submitted.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner failed to demonstrate that the role of martial arts judge involves evaluating competitors' work or skills rather than merely enforcing rules and ensuring sportsmanlike competition. No evidence such as official competition rules or documentation of awarding points was submitted.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-11_01_B2203; source_row=24840 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c