Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
AAO recalculated the Petitioner's net current assets correctly (including accounts payable as a current liability) and found all three years well below the proffered wage; rejected reliance on fixed assets and partners' capital as not available funds; and found Sonegawa factors insufficient.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO recalculated the Petitioner's net current assets correctly (including accounts payable as a current liability) and found all three years well below the proffered wage; rejected reliance on fixed assets and partners' capital as not available funds; and found Sonegawa factors insufficient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-09_02_B5203; source_row=24814 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Bona fide job offer / conducting business as a church
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that the record lacked sufficient independent, objective evidence showing the Petitioner conducted religious services in a church or had a congregation for the Beneficiary to serve as education pastor. The two listed locations were unsuitable for religious worship and education, and the Petitioner declined to provide requested corroborating documentation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the record lacked sufficient independent, objective evidence showing the Petitioner conducted religious services in a church or had a congregation for the Beneficiary to serve as education pastor. The two listed locations were unsuitable for religious worship and education, and the Petitioner declined to provide requested corroborating documentation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-09_01_B5203; source_row=24812 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Ability to pay proffered wage through approval date (July 1 – August 20, 2015)
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO disagreed with the Director's reasoning about the validity of the audited statements, finding them validly prepared. However, AAO still found the ability-to-pay requirement unmet because the 2015 financials only covered through June 30, 2015, leaving a gap through the August 20, 2015 approval date.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director's reasoning about the validity of the audited statements, finding them validly prepared. However, AAO still found the ability-to-pay requirement unmet because the 2015 financials only covered through June 30, 2015, leaving a gap through the August 20, 2015 approval date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-09_01_B5203; source_row=24813 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherFaculty
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner submitted evidence of lectures and articles, but did not provide sufficient information about these activities to establish that they constitute original contributions of major significance in the field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner submitted evidence of lectures and articles, but did not provide sufficient information about these activities to establish that they constitute original contributions of major significance in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-05_01_B2203; source_row=24809 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherFaculty
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner failed to provide independent evidence showing that submitted newspaper and magazine articles appeared in major Turkish publications with high circulation statistics.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner failed to provide independent evidence showing that submitted newspaper and magazine articles appeared in major Turkish publications with high circulation statistics.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-05_01_B2203; source_row=24807 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherFaculty
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim at the very top of the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner's accomplishments, while noteworthy, do not establish sustained national or international acclaim. His primary recognition stems from one award-winning film in 2009 and a documentary series in 2014, with insufficient evidence of ongoing acclaim, commercial success, major media coverage, or influence on the field. Testimonial letters were too vague and hyperbolic to establish major significance.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's accomplishments, while noteworthy, do not establish sustained national or international acclaim. His primary recognition stems from one award-winning film in 2009 and a documentary series in 2014, with insufficient evidence of ongoing acclaim, commercial success, major media coverage, or influence on the field. Testimonial letters were too vague and hyperbolic to establish major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-05_01_B2203; source_row=24811 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c