Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 13961–13970
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Materials Science
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
Because the Petitioner failed to meet the step-one threshold of three criteria, a formal final merits determination was unnecessary under Kazarian. The AAO noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support the required level of acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Because the Petitioner failed to meet the step-one threshold of three criteria, a formal final merits determination was unnecessary under Kazarian. The AAO noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support the required level of acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-21_04_B2203; source_row=24735 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for distinguished organization
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO agreed that while the Petitioner's colleagues praised her contributions to specific projects, the letters did not explain how her role was of significant importance to the outcome or standing of the organization as a whole, and the record lacked documentation of her job duties or placement in the company hierarchy.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed that while the Petitioner's colleagues praised her contributions to specific projects, the letters did not explain how her role was of significant importance to the outcome or standing of the organization as a whole, and the record lacked documentation of her job duties or placement in the company hierarchy.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-21_04_B2203; source_row=24734 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other1,999 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to make a formal final merits determination since step 1 was not satisfied, while noting in the aggregate the record would not support sustained acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to make a formal final merits determination since step 1 was not satisfied, while noting in the aggregate the record would not support sustained acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-21_02_B2203; source_row=24723 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Both the Director and AAO agreed that the Petitioner satisfied the judging criterion. AAO did not provide separate analysis beyond confirming the Director's finding.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
Both the Director and AAO agreed that the Petitioner satisfied the judging criterion. AAO did not provide separate analysis beyond confirming the Director's finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-21_01_B2203; source_row=24716 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Environment / Energy
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold requirement of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the record does not support the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold requirement of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the record does not support the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-21_01_B2203; source_row=24719 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Both the Director and AAO agreed that the Petitioner satisfied the scholarly articles criterion. AAO did not provide separate analysis beyond confirming the Director's finding.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
Both the Director and AAO agreed that the Petitioner satisfied the scholarly articles criterion. AAO did not provide separate analysis beyond confirming the Director's finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-21_01_B2203; source_row=24718 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of the individual's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why AAO was not persuaded
Exhibits 'p' through 's' referenced in the cover letter as supporting this criterion were never actually submitted with the RFE response; remaining evidence was a partially illegible photograph and a photograph of a badge without official festival documentation, which was insufficient.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Exhibits 'p' through 's' referenced in the cover letter as supporting this criterion were never actually submitted with the RFE response; remaining evidence was a partially illegible photograph and a photograph of a badge without official festival documentation, which was insufficient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-21_05_B2203; source_row=24738 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c