Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 14001–14010
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical16 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
The letter from the organization's chairman mentioned the Petitioner only in passing and did not explain how his editorial role was leading or critical for the organization. The film director's letters confirmed the Petitioner's contribution to the film but did not speak on behalf of the organization.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The letter from the organization's chairman mentioned the Petitioner only in passing and did not explain how his editorial role was leading or critical for the organization. The film director's letters confirmed the Petitioner's contribution to the film but did not speak on behalf of the organization. It also remained unclear whether the Petitioner was engaged directly by the organization or by some other entity, and the record lacked sufficient corroborating evidence of the organization's distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-14_03_B2203; source_row=24685 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Daily Times Nigeria and New Telegraph did not appear on either submitted Top 10 list. Leadership appeared on one list as #10 but the article about the Petitioner was in the print edition and no evidence showed it appeared online. Circulation figures of 55,000–65,000 could not be determined to represent major media without comparative data.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Daily Times Nigeria and New Telegraph did not appear on either submitted Top 10 list. Leadership appeared on one list as #10 but the article about the Petitioner was in the print edition and no evidence showed it appeared online. Circulation figures of 55,000–65,000 could not be determined to represent major media without comparative data. Post-filing articles in Vanguard and The Sun could not be relied upon as eligibility must be established from the time of filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-14_03_B2203; source_row=24682 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why AAO was not persuaded
Most of the new evidence post-dates the petition filing and is ineligible to establish eligibility at the time of filing. Even considered on the merits, article download counts without evidence of implementation or scholarly impact, an unsubstantiated self-compiled citation index, and invitations to peer review do not collectively show a record of success or level of field interest sufficient to establish that the Petitione…
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
Most of the new evidence post-dates the petition filing and is ineligible to establish eligibility at the time of filing. Even considered on the merits, article download counts without evidence of implementation or scholarly impact, an unsubstantiated self-compiled citation index, and invitations to peer review do not collectively show a record of success or level of field interest sufficient to establish that the Petitioner is well positioned to advance his research.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-14_02_B5203; source_row=24679 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that the Petitioner holds only a U.S. baccalaureate degree (conferred May 2016) and, as of the March 2018 filing date, had not accumulated the required five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience to be deemed equivalent to a master's degree.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner holds only a U.S. baccalaureate degree (conferred May 2016) and, as of the March 2018 filing date, had not accumulated the required five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience to be deemed equivalent to a master's degree.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-14_01_B5203; source_row=24665 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew the Director's finding that this criterion was satisfied because the Petitioner had never claimed it, submitted no relevant evidence, and on appeal offered no explanation of how any evidence supported it.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding that this criterion was satisfied because the Petitioner had never claimed it, submitted no relevant evidence, and on appeal offered no explanation of how any evidence supported it.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-14_02_B2203; source_row=24675 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed the Petitioner satisfied this criterion as an athlete based on national competition wins, but noted he did not satisfy it as a coach because the 'Best Coach' certificate was ambiguous as to whether it was an award or nomination and whether it was national or merely school-level.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the Petitioner satisfied this criterion as an athlete based on national competition wins, but noted he did not satisfy it as a coach because the 'Best Coach' certificate was ambiguous as to whether it was an award or nomination and whether it was national or merely school-level.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-14_02_B2203; source_row=24670 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
Final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold evidentiary requirements, but noted in advisory dicta that the record does not support the required showing of acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold evidentiary requirements, but noted in advisory dicta that the record does not support the required showing of acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-14_02_B2203; source_row=24677 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
What the decision said
AAO acknowledged that the DOE and White House documents help show substantial merit and national importance but declined to resolve this prong because prong 2 was dispositive.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO acknowledged that the DOE and White House documents help show substantial merit and national importance but declined to resolve this prong because prong 2 was dispositive.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-14_02_B5203; source_row=24678 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c