Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
The AAO agreed that the Petitioner's peer review of manuscripts for several medical journals and service on the editorial board of Clinical Case Reports satisfied the judging criterion.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed that the Petitioner's peer review of manuscripts for several medical journals and service on the editorial board of Clinical Case Reports satisfied the judging criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-13_01_B2203; source_row=24652 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
The AAO agreed the Petitioner's cancer research has substantial merit and concluded the evidence was sufficient to demonstrate national importance, disagreeing with the Director's reliance on limited research time as a basis for denying the first prong. However, the AAO agreed that the Petitioner's clinical and teaching activities lack national importance because they would not impact the field more broadly.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed the Petitioner's cancer research has substantial merit and concluded the evidence was sufficient to demonstrate national importance, disagreeing with the Director's reliance on limited research time as a basis for denying the first prong. However, the AAO agreed that the Petitioner's clinical and teaching activities lack national importance because they would not impact the field more broadly.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-13_01_B5203; source_row=24656 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The 'highest category' coach-teacher qualification does not require outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts because the same category is available for athletes placing second at lower-tier competitions. Employment at the sports college does not constitute 'membership' in an association.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The 'highest category' coach-teacher qualification does not require outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts because the same category is available for athletes placing second at lower-tier competitions. Employment at the sports college does not constitute 'membership' in an association.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-12_01_B2203; source_row=24644 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
While manuals may show originality, the Petitioner did not establish how they had major significance in the field. Students' personal achievements do not constitute the Petitioner's original contributions of major significance in the overall field. Reference letters were conclusory and lacked specific details about unusual influence on the field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
While manuals may show originality, the Petitioner did not establish how they had major significance in the field. Students' personal achievements do not constitute the Petitioner's original contributions of major significance in the overall field. Reference letters were conclusory and lacked specific details about unusual influence on the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-12_01_B2203; source_row=24647 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for distinguished organization
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's role as turon department coach was not shown to be leading or critical to the college as a whole, and was far lesser than the deputy director's role. The Petitioner also failed to establish the college's distinguished reputation, relying on Wikipedia screenshots that do not address the specific institution.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's role as turon department coach was not shown to be leading or critical to the college as a whole, and was far lesser than the deputy director's role. The Petitioner also failed to establish the college's distinguished reputation, relying on Wikipedia screenshots that do not address the specific institution.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-12_01_B2203; source_row=24649 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
Most articles lacked required authors; several articles were not about the Petitioner but merely mentioned him as one of many competitors. The Petitioner failed to establish that any of the newspapers or television programs qualify as major media. Several TV program transcripts also lacked required title, author, or full date information.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Most articles lacked required authors; several articles were not about the Petitioner but merely mentioned him as one of many competitors. The Petitioner failed to establish that any of the newspapers or television programs qualify as major media. Several TV program transcripts also lacked required title, author, or full date information.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-12_01_B2203; source_row=24645 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The federation letter was inconsistent with the Petitioner's claimed wins, did not address the significance of the championships, and neither the letter nor the certificates showed the awards were nationally or internationally recognized for excellence. Trainees' awards do not satisfy the criterion because it requires the alien to receive the prizes, and the comparable evidence argument was unsupported.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The federation letter was inconsistent with the Petitioner's claimed wins, did not address the significance of the championships, and neither the letter nor the certificates showed the awards were nationally or internationally recognized for excellence. Trainees' awards do not satisfy the criterion because it requires the alien to receive the prizes, and the comparable evidence argument was unsupported.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-12_01_B2203; source_row=24643 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner failed to demonstrate that Science to Sport is a professional or major trade publication or other major medium, providing no supporting evidence about the publication's nature or standing.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner failed to demonstrate that Science to Sport is a professional or major trade publication or other major medium, providing no supporting evidence about the publication's nature or standing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-12_01_B2203; source_row=24648 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The evidence did not describe the duties of a single combat turon referee/judge to show whether they involve evaluating competitors' work or merely enforcing rules. The Petitioner also failed to provide full English translations of manual sections regarding judging, as required by regulation.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The evidence did not describe the duties of a single combat turon referee/judge to show whether they involve evaluating competitors' work or merely enforcing rules. The Petitioner also failed to provide full English translations of manual sections regarding judging, as required by regulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-12_01_B2203; source_row=24646 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
Published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The only published article was published after the petition filing date, and eligibility must be established at the time of filing. No pre-filing published material was submitted.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The only published article was published after the petition filing date, and eligibility must be established at the time of filing. No pre-filing published material was submitted.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-07_02_B2203; source_row=24634 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c