Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner did not demonstrate how film, theater, and TV productions equate to organizations, did not provide background information on the production companies to establish their distinguished reputation, and the limited background information on one production company did not establish it as an organization with a distinguished reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not demonstrate how film, theater, and TV productions equate to organizations, did not provide background information on the production companies to establish their distinguished reputation, and the limited background information on one production company did not establish it as an organization with a distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-05_02_B2203; source_row=24624 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
Original scientific, scholarly, artistic, or business-related contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The evidence does not show that the Petitioner's work has been widely implemented, has remarkably impacted the field, or has otherwise risen to the level of major significance. The Rising Star award press release does not establish its scope and significance; film festival awards were not shown to go to the Petitioner personally; and the Bulgaria On Air article does not demonstrate an original contribution of major signific…
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The evidence does not show that the Petitioner's work has been widely implemented, has remarkably impacted the field, or has otherwise risen to the level of major significance. The Rising Star award press release does not establish its scope and significance; film festival awards were not shown to go to the Petitioner personally; and the Bulgaria On Air article does not demonstrate an original contribution of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-05_02_B2203; source_row=24622 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
High salary or significantly high remuneration for services
Why AAO was not persuaded
The 2018 check post-dates the October 2017 petition filing and cannot be considered. The claimed $300-$400/hour wages from the project list are unsubstantiated because the Petitioner provided no tax returns or paychecks to verify actual earnings from acting assignments.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The 2018 check post-dates the October 2017 petition filing and cannot be considered. The claimed $300-$400/hour wages from the project list are unsubstantiated because the Petitioner provided no tax returns or paychecks to verify actual earnings from acting assignments.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-05_02_B2203; source_row=24625 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's description of the proposed endeavor lacks specific, detailed information, so AAO cannot determine that the work has substantial merit and national importance.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's description of the proposed endeavor lacks specific, detailed information, so AAO cannot determine that the work has substantial merit and national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-05_01_B5203; source_row=24615 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
The AAO declined to reach a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not satisfy the threshold requirement of three criteria, but noted in advisory dicta that the record does not support the required finding of sustained acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO declined to reach a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not satisfy the threshold requirement of three criteria, but noted in advisory dicta that the record does not support the required finding of sustained acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-05_01_B2203; source_row=24612 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Display of the individual's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO disagreed with the Director and found that the record reflects the Petitioner performed as an actress in theatrical settings, establishing that she fulfills this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director and found that the record reflects the Petitioner performed as an actress in theatrical settings, establishing that she fulfills this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-05_02_B2203; source_row=24623 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
Final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim
What the decision said
AAO explicitly reserved this issue because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the step-one threshold of at least three evidentiary criteria, though it noted in dicta that the record does not support a finding of the required level of expertise.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly reserved this issue because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the step-one threshold of at least three evidentiary criteria, though it noted in dicta that the record does not support a finding of the required level of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-05_02_B2203; source_row=24626 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The submitted certificates were not accompanied by official academic records or a credentials evaluation, and the U.S. issuing institution was not shown to be accredited.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The submitted certificates were not accompanied by official academic records or a credentials evaluation, and the U.S. issuing institution was not shown to be accredited.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-05_01_B5203; source_row=24613 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c