Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 14111–14120
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical43 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed the initial evidence threshold, but noted in the aggregate the record would not support the required finding.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed the initial evidence threshold, but noted in the aggregate the record would not support the required finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-10-25_01_B2203; source_row=24570 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO disagreed with the Director and found that the Petitioner documented co-authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications, including the Institute of Dentistry's journal Clinical Dentistry, satisfying this criterion.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director and found that the Petitioner documented co-authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications, including the Institute of Dentistry's journal Clinical Dentistry, satisfying this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-10-25_01_B2203; source_row=24569 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences1,066 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that citation counts were not sufficient to establish individual acclaim because many highly-cited papers were consortium works with dozens of authors, citations were often passing references rather than highlighting the Petitioner's work specifically, and the editorial board membership lacked evidence of selectivity.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that citation counts were not sufficient to establish individual acclaim because many highly-cited papers were consortium works with dozens of authors, citations were often passing references rather than highlighting the Petitioner's work specifically, and the editorial board membership lacked evidence of selectivity. The record showed the Petitioner's work was well received but did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim placing him at the very top of his field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-10-23_01_B2203; source_row=24563 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer
Why the evidence was persuasive
Given the appeal was sustained under the Dhanasar framework, AAO found the third prong met. The detailed analysis is not visible in the provided excerpt.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
Given the appeal was sustained under the Dhanasar framework, AAO found the third prong met. The detailed analysis is not visible in the provided excerpt.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-10-23_01_B5203; source_row=24566 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed with the Director that the proposed research has substantial merit and national importance, citing letters from FDA and industry experts and dissemination through journals and conferences.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the proposed research has substantial merit and national importance, citing letters from FDA and industry experts and dissemination through journals and conferences.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-10-23_01_B5203; source_row=24564 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found Petitioner well positioned, citing specific FDA and industry expert letters describing how his discoveries about pathogen attachment to dust, phenotypic states, and detection assays have been integrated into FDA guidance and industry practice.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found Petitioner well positioned, citing specific FDA and industry expert letters describing how his discoveries about pathogen attachment to dust, phenotypic states, and detection assays have been integrated into FDA guidance and industry practice.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-10-23_01_B5203; source_row=24565 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for distinguished organization
Why AAO was not persuaded
The management agreement was executed in January 2018, after the petition's initial filing, and therefore could not establish eligibility at the time of filing. Even setting timing aside, being a contracted artist does not show a leading or critical role within an organization, the company's distinguished reputation was not independently corroborated, and a play does not qualify as an 'organization or establishment' under t…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The management agreement was executed in January 2018, after the petition's initial filing, and therefore could not establish eligibility at the time of filing. Even setting timing aside, being a contracted artist does not show a leading or critical role within an organization, the company's distinguished reputation was not independently corroborated, and a play does not qualify as an 'organization or establishment' under the regulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-10-22_01_B2203; source_row=24551 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
The article was about a play, not about the Petitioner, and she was only mentioned once among several actors. Additionally, the Petitioner failed to identify the author of the article, and did not demonstrate that broadwayworld.com qualifies as a major medium.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The article was about a play, not about the Petitioner, and she was only mentioned once among several actors. Additionally, the Petitioner failed to identify the author of the article, and did not demonstrate that broadwayworld.com qualifies as a major medium.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-10-22_01_B2203; source_row=24549 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c