Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
The record was ambiguous as to whether the Petitioner actually participated as a judge for the literary award, and the award went to writers and poets in fields not shown to be allied to her own. The letters about journalism school jury service were vague and inconsistent, with no documentary corroboration from the school. The article about the constitutional reform award had mismatched dates and no identified source.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The record was ambiguous as to whether the Petitioner actually participated as a judge for the literary award, and the award went to writers and poets in fields not shown to be allied to her own. The letters about journalism school jury service were vague and inconsistent, with no documentary corroboration from the school. The article about the constitutional reform award had mismatched dates and no identified source.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-10-08_01_B2203; source_row=24513 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The claimed memberships were not shown to require outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts. A university degree, faculty position, professional register listings, and employment by a broadcaster do not constitute qualifying associations. Co-founding an organization does not demonstrate that recognized experts judged the Petitioner's achievements as outstanding.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The claimed memberships were not shown to require outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts. A university degree, faculty position, professional register listings, and employment by a broadcaster do not constitute qualifying associations. Co-founding an organization does not demonstrate that recognized experts judged the Petitioner's achievements as outstanding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-10-08_01_B2203; source_row=24512 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
The role of a network journalist among 1,600 full-time journalists is not automatically leading or critical. The claims about directing or founding a journalism school were vague and inconsistent, with no documentary corroboration. The record did not establish that the Petitioner was an anchor rather than a correspondent.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The role of a network journalist among 1,600 full-time journalists is not automatically leading or critical. The claims about directing or founding a journalism school were vague and inconsistent, with no documentary corroboration. The record did not establish that the Petitioner was an anchor rather than a correspondent.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-10-08_01_B2203; source_row=24516 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The letters from prestigious figures demonstrated familiarity with the award but did not establish that the Petitioner's contribution was of major significance in the field. The Petitioner also failed to show how co-creating the award was an original contribution, as she identified no characteristic distinguishing it from other literary prizes.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The letters from prestigious figures demonstrated familiarity with the award but did not establish that the Petitioner's contribution was of major significance in the field. The Petitioner also failed to show how co-creating the award was an original contribution, as she identified no characteristic distinguishing it from other literary prizes.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-10-08_01_B2203; source_row=24514 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to reach the formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed step 1, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record would not support the required level of acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed step 1, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record would not support the required level of acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-10-08_01_B2203; source_row=24518 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
What the decision said
The Petitioner did not defend this criterion on appeal; AAO considered it abandoned. The appellate brief discussed display only abstractly in the context of comparable evidence and disputing Kazarian, without addressing the specifics of the case.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not defend this criterion on appeal; AAO considered it abandoned. The appellate brief discussed display only abstractly in the context of comparable evidence and disputing Kazarian, without addressing the specifics of the case.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-10-08_01_B2203; source_row=24515 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration
What the decision said
The Petitioner did not revisit this criterion on appeal; AAO considered it abandoned. AAO also noted the Petitioner misrepresented her compensation: the letter showed pay was 146,530,160 Italian lira, equating to approximately $59,140.70 USD, not $146,530.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not revisit this criterion on appeal; AAO considered it abandoned. AAO also noted the Petitioner misrepresented her compensation: the letter showed pay was 146,530,160 Italian lira, equating to approximately $59,140.70 USD, not $146,530.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-10-08_01_B2203; source_row=24517 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mechanical / Manufacturing Engineering
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO concludes the record does not show the proposed endeavor extends beyond the employer and its clients to impact the industry more broadly, nor does it show original innovations advancing the industry or substantial positive economic effects or U.S. job creation.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO concludes the record does not show the proposed endeavor extends beyond the employer and its clients to impact the industry more broadly, nor does it show original innovations advancing the industry or substantial positive economic effects or U.S. job creation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-10-08_01_B5203; source_row=24519 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c