Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 14171–14180
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot established
Case facts
Business / ManagementProfessor
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Membership
membership in associations
Why AAO was not persuaded
The record did not demonstrate CECIEx's criteria for board membership or its selection process. While other board members may be highly qualified, comparing oneself to other members is insufficient. The record did not show CECIEx requires outstanding achievements, as judged by recognized national or international experts, to be appointed to its board.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record did not demonstrate CECIEx's criteria for board membership or its selection process. While other board members may be highly qualified, comparing oneself to other members is insufficient. The record did not show CECIEx requires outstanding achievements, as judged by recognized national or international experts, to be appointed to its board.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-10-02_02_B2203; source_row=24493 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Business / ManagementProfessor
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The recommendation letters did not demonstrate the impact or influence of the Petitioner's work at a level of major significance in the field as a whole. The training manual's influence was limited to a single program and did not show widespread implementation or seminal impact on the broader field. Conference presentations alone were insufficient absent evidence of major significance.…
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The recommendation letters did not demonstrate the impact or influence of the Petitioner's work at a level of major significance in the field as a whole. The training manual's influence was limited to a single program and did not show widespread implementation or seminal impact on the broader field. Conference presentations alone were insufficient absent evidence of major significance. The letters were conclusory and lacked specifics.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-10-02_02_B2203; source_row=24496 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The articles were not about the Petitioner but focused on projects, merely mentioning or quoting him. One article lacked an identified author. Articles that are not about the petitioner do not satisfy this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The articles were not about the Petitioner but focused on projects, merely mentioning or quoting him. One article lacked an identified author. Articles that are not about the petitioner do not satisfy this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-10-02_02_B2203; source_row=24494 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Order of Business Merit award lacked explanation connecting the Portuguese Republic award documentation to the actual certificate received. The remaining awards were given to the Petitioner's company, not to him personally; even assuming company awards could count, he did not show he was responsible for the recognized achievements.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Order of Business Merit award lacked explanation connecting the Portuguese Republic award documentation to the actual certificate received. The remaining awards were given to the Petitioner's company, not to him personally; even assuming company awards could count, he did not show he was responsible for the recognized achievements. None of the awards were shown to be nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field beyond the awarding entities.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-10-02_02_B2203; source_row=24492 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The company's income tax return did not show the Petitioner's personal salary or remuneration. The evidence did not demonstrate that his earnings placed him at the high end of the spectrum for chief executives, and he provided no evidence of other significantly high remuneration.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The company's income tax return did not show the Petitioner's personal salary or remuneration. The evidence did not demonstrate that his earnings placed him at the high end of the spectrum for chief executives, and he provided no evidence of other significantly high remuneration.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-10-02_02_B2203; source_row=24498 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / ManagementProfessor
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet at least three criteria, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support a finding of the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet at least three criteria, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support a finding of the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-10-02_02_B2203; source_row=24499 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Employment as a contract artist does not constitute 'membership' in an association, and the Petitioner did not show that outstanding achievements are required for band membership or that membership judges are recognized national or international experts.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Employment as a contract artist does not constitute 'membership' in an association, and the Petitioner did not show that outstanding achievements are required for band membership or that membership judges are recognized national or international experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-10-01_02_B2203; source_row=24464 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the marketing materials were not published material about the Petitioner, the articles were about the band rather than the Petitioner, the publications were not shown to be major media, and required elements (title, date, author) were missing.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the marketing materials were not published material about the Petitioner, the articles were about the band rather than the Petitioner, the publications were not shown to be major media, and required elements (title, date, author) were missing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-10-01_02_B2203; source_row=24465 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c