Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
AAO reversed the Director's finding, concluding that the vocational diploma represented enrollment at an academic institution rather than membership in an association. The national team membership letter merely repeated regulatory language without explaining outstanding achievement requirements or the selection process, and the Petitioner did not provide corroborating evidence about the membership criteria or expert selectors.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reversed the Director's finding, concluding that the vocational diploma represented enrollment at an academic institution rather than membership in an association. The national team membership letter merely repeated regulatory language without explaining outstanding achievement requirements or the selection process, and the Petitioner did not provide corroborating evidence about the membership criteria or expert selectors.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-09-03_01_B2203; source_row=24348 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner submitted newspaper articles from Lelo and People's Education, but failed to demonstrate these were major media. The publications were not among those identified as major Georgian newspapers, had modest circulation, and the Petitioner did not provide comparative statistics showing they qualified as major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner submitted newspaper articles from Lelo and People's Education, but failed to demonstrate these were major media. The publications were not among those identified as major Georgian newspapers, had modest circulation, and the Petitioner did not provide comparative statistics showing they qualified as major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-09-03_01_B2203; source_row=24349 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner submitted evidence of serving as a referee at weightlifting tournaments but failed to demonstrate that refereeing duties involved judging the work of others (e.g., awarding points or choosing a winner) rather than merely enforcing rules and ensuring safety.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner submitted evidence of serving as a referee at weightlifting tournaments but failed to demonstrate that refereeing duties involved judging the work of others (e.g., awarding points or choosing a winner) rather than merely enforcing rules and ensuring safety.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-09-03_01_B2203; source_row=24350 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner fulfilled the judging criterion based on her service as a judge for the Computer and Innovation Competition.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner fulfilled the judging criterion based on her service as a judge for the Computer and Innovation Competition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-09-03_02_B2203; source_row=24356 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
Final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to conduct a final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three evidentiary criteria, though it noted in dicta that the record did not demonstrate the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to conduct a final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three evidentiary criteria, though it noted in dicta that the record did not demonstrate the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-09-03_02_B2203; source_row=24361 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications
Why the evidence was persuasive
The record reflects that the Petitioner authored scholarly articles in professional publications, and the AAO agreed with the Director that this criterion was fulfilled.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The record reflects that the Petitioner authored scholarly articles in professional publications, and the AAO agreed with the Director that this criterion was fulfilled.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-09-03_04_B2203; source_row=24371 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
The letters and articles did not establish that the Petitioner held a leading position at the university as a whole. Her role as director of the Chinese language program was subordinate compared to the dean and president, and her impact was limited to the Chinese program rather than the university overall.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The letters and articles did not establish that the Petitioner held a leading position at the university as a whole. Her role as director of the Chinese language program was subordinate compared to the dean and president, and her impact was limited to the Chinese program rather than the university overall. Even if her role were considered critical, the evidence addressed only the Chinese program, not the success or standing of the entire institution.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-09-03_04_B2203; source_row=24372 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
The AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of at least three criteria, but noted in dicta that the record did not support sustained national or international acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of at least three criteria, but noted in dicta that the record did not support sustained national or international acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-09-03_04_B2203; source_row=24373 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO disagreed with the Director, finding that articles in The New York Times and the Sydney Morning Herald describe the Petitioner's background, career, and work at length, satisfying this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director, finding that articles in The New York Times and the Sydney Morning Herald describe the Petitioner's background, career, and work at length, satisfying this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-09-03_03_B2203; source_row=24363 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold requirement of three evidentiary criteria, but noted the overall record would not support a finding of extraordinary ability.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold requirement of three evidentiary criteria, but noted the overall record would not support a finding of extraordinary ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-09-03_03_B2203; source_row=24367 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c