Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that one book chapter qualified as a scholarly article based on reference letters confirming it was written in accordance with academic standards with footnotes and scholarly language, though the other evidence did not meet the scholarly article threshold.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that one book chapter qualified as a scholarly article based on reference letters confirming it was written in accordance with academic standards with footnotes and scholarly language, though the other evidence did not meet the scholarly article threshold.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-09-03_03_B2203; source_row=24365 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the step-one threshold of at least three criteria, but noted in passing that the record would not support a finding of extraordinary ability.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the step-one threshold of at least three criteria, but noted in passing that the record would not support a finding of extraordinary ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-09-03_01_B2203; source_row=24352 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner presented documentation showing he won nationally recognized awards for excellence in weightlifting, including first place at a national competition in 2014. AAO agreed with the Director that this criterion was met.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner presented documentation showing he won nationally recognized awards for excellence in weightlifting, including first place at a national competition in 2014. AAO agreed with the Director that this criterion was met.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-09-03_01_B2203; source_row=24347 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner failed to demonstrate that membership requires outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts. When the Director requested the constitution or bylaws, the Petitioner did not respond.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner failed to demonstrate that membership requires outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts. When the Director requested the constitution or bylaws, the Petitioner did not respond.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-08-27_01_B2203; source_row=24328 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner did not establish that his advisory role was critical to the organization's overall activities, did not show he completed the project or how it contributed to the organization's success, and failed to demonstrate that the organization enjoys a distinguished reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner did not establish that his advisory role was critical to the organization's overall activities, did not show he completed the project or how it contributed to the organization's success, and failed to demonstrate that the organization enjoys a distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-08-27_01_B2203; source_row=24331 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the Petitioner did not provide English translations for foreign language award certificates, and failed to demonstrate that the awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field of education.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the Petitioner did not provide English translations for foreign language award certificates, and failed to demonstrate that the awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field of education.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-08-27_01_B2203; source_row=24327 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the Petitioner submitted foreign language documents without complete certified translations, making it impossible to verify the claims. Additionally, the Petitioner only showed he was invited or selected to judge, not that he actually participated in judging.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the Petitioner submitted foreign language documents without complete certified translations, making it impossible to verify the claims. Additionally, the Petitioner only showed he was invited or selected to judge, not that he actually participated in judging.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-08-27_01_B2203; source_row=24329 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner did not provide the membership requirements for XHC or OCAC, and therefore failed to show that membership requires outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not provide the membership requirements for XHC or OCAC, and therefore failed to show that membership requires outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-08-27_02_B2203; source_row=24340 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that Clio gold/silver/bronze awards are given to thousands annually and the record did not demonstrate they are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence. Finalist status at Cannes Lions and other competitions was not shown to constitute a nationally or internationally recognized prize or award. Other awards lacked sufficient evidence of national or international recognition.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that Clio gold/silver/bronze awards are given to thousands annually and the record did not demonstrate they are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence. Finalist status at Cannes Lions and other competitions was not shown to constitute a nationally or internationally recognized prize or award. Other awards lacked sufficient evidence of national or international recognition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-08-27_02_B2203; source_row=24339 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the Salary.com data did not specify the geographic region, and the Petitioner did not compare the Beneficiary's salary to high salaries of creative directors in the relevant metropolitan area. A salary above the median does not establish a high salary relative to others in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the Salary.com data did not specify the geographic region, and the Petitioner did not compare the Beneficiary's salary to high salaries of creative directors in the relevant metropolitan area. A salary above the median does not establish a high salary relative to others in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-08-27_02_B2203; source_row=24345 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c