Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
display of work in artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed that the record includes articles, letters of recommendation, and an award showing the Petitioner's paintings were displayed at the SNBA annual exhibition.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the record includes articles, letters of recommendation, and an award showing the Petitioner's paintings were displayed at the SNBA annual exhibition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-08-14_01_B2203; source_row=24311 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
ARJAS membership requires participation, competence, knowledge, and experience, which do not rise to the level of 'outstanding achievements' required by the criterion, and the Petitioner did not establish that membership is judged by recognized national or international experts.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
ARJAS membership requires participation, competence, knowledge, and experience, which do not rise to the level of 'outstanding achievements' required by the criterion, and the Petitioner did not establish that membership is judged by recognized national or international experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-08-13_01_B2203; source_row=24302 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other69 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's 45 independent citations were not shown to be unusually high in her field or compared to other majorly significant articles; the three article excerpts did not show broader field significance; the letters lacked specifics and used conclusory language without explaining how her contributions had major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's 45 independent citations were not shown to be unusually high in her field or compared to other majorly significant articles; the three article excerpts did not show broader field significance; the letters lacked specifics and used conclusory language without explaining how her contributions had major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-08-13_01_B2203; source_row=24304 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for distinguished organization
Why AAO was not persuaded
The letter did not establish a leading position or the Petitioner's essential and critical role, did not describe the organizational hierarchy or compare her position to others, did not show how her projects contributed to the organization's success, and the Petitioner did not demonstrate the organization enjoys a distinguished reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The letter did not establish a leading position or the Petitioner's essential and critical role, did not describe the organizational hierarchy or compare her position to others, did not show how her projects contributed to the organization's success, and the Petitioner did not demonstrate the organization enjoys a distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-08-13_01_B2203; source_row=24306 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The medals relate to patriotic education and youth education activities, not to psychology specifically, and the Petitioner did not establish that her field of endeavor recognizes these medals as national or international prizes for excellence consistent with the regulatory criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The medals relate to patriotic education and youth education activities, not to psychology specifically, and the Petitioner did not establish that her field of endeavor recognizes these medals as national or international prizes for excellence consistent with the regulatory criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-08-13_01_B2203; source_row=24301 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other69 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in the aggregate the record does not support the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in the aggregate the record does not support the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-08-13_01_B2203; source_row=24307 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
labor certification supports advanced degree professional classification
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agrees the H.14 language exceeds standard Kellogg phrasing because it does not require that a 'combination of degrees' include at least a bachelor's degree, allowing sub-baccalaureate combinations to qualify, which defeats EB-2 advanced-degree classification.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agrees the H.14 language exceeds standard Kellogg phrasing because it does not require that a 'combination of degrees' include at least a bachelor's degree, allowing sub-baccalaureate combinations to qualify, which defeats EB-2 advanced-degree classification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-08-12_02_B5203; source_row=24300 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the NOIR's factual allegations insufficient to support revocation because a petition is an offer of future employment that need not yet be fulfilled, and the revocation decision additionally relied on facts not included in the NOIR, depriving the Petitioner of an opportunity to respond.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the NOIR's factual allegations insufficient to support revocation because a petition is an offer of future employment that need not yet be fulfilled, and the revocation decision additionally relied on facts not included in the NOIR, depriving the Petitioner of an opportunity to respond.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-08-12_01_B5203; source_row=24298 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c