Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 14381–14390
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the evidence demonstrated the Petitioner served in the prestigious role of Global Practice Leader for Maritime and was tasked with building a new maritime practice and developing the global maritime practice, at a firm of distinguished reputation as shown by articles in the record.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the evidence demonstrated the Petitioner served in the prestigious role of Global Practice Leader for Maritime and was tasked with building a new maritime practice and developing the global maritime practice, at a firm of distinguished reputation as shown by articles in the record.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-08-07_04_B2203; source_row=24296 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Beneficiary's qualifying experience for offered position
Why AAO was not persuaded
The experience certificate did not describe specific duties performed, contained discrepancies with the labor certification application regarding concurrent employment and end dates, and did not establish that the Beneficiary performed the primary duties of the offered unit manager position.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The experience certificate did not describe specific duties performed, contained discrepancies with the labor certification application regarding concurrent employment and end dates, and did not establish that the Beneficiary performed the primary duties of the offered unit manager position.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-08-07_01_B5203; source_row=24278 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner's CEO letter relied on 2015 financial data that predated the 2018 priority date by more than two years and did not account for the combined wage obligations across multiple petitions, including another approved petition as of the same priority date.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's CEO letter relied on 2015 financial data that predated the 2018 priority date by more than two years and did not account for the combined wage obligations across multiple petitions, including another approved petition as of the same priority date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-08-07_01_B5203; source_row=24279 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO found the submitted W-2s and tax returns sufficient to demonstrate the Petitioner's ability to pay the proffered wage throughout the relevant period, withdrawing the prior adverse finding on this issue.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found the submitted W-2s and tax returns sufficient to demonstrate the Petitioner's ability to pay the proffered wage throughout the relevant period, withdrawing the prior adverse finding on this issue.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-08-06_01_B5203; source_row=24270 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The misrepresentation was material because withholding the familial relationship information shut off a line of inquiry by DOL into whether the position of senior energy analyst was a bona fide job opportunity open to U.S. workers.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The misrepresentation was material because withholding the familial relationship information shut off a line of inquiry by DOL into whether the position of senior energy analyst was a bona fide job opportunity open to U.S. workers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-08-06_01_B5203; source_row=24269 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner's signature on the labor certification under penalty of perjury creates a strong presumption of knowledge; the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, even if valid, does not rise to the level of fraud, deceit, or other wrongful acts by another person necessary to rebut that presumption.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's signature on the labor certification under penalty of perjury creates a strong presumption of knowledge; the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, even if valid, does not rise to the level of fraud, deceit, or other wrongful acts by another person necessary to rebut that presumption.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-08-06_01_B5203; source_row=24268 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
False representation on labor certification (Part C.9)
Why the evidence was persuasive
The Beneficiary is the brother of the Petitioner's organizer/sole member/manager; therefore the answer 'No' to C.9 was false because a familial relationship clearly exists.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Beneficiary is the brother of the Petitioner's organizer/sole member/manager; therefore the answer 'No' to C.9 was false because a familial relationship clearly exists.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-08-06_01_B5203; source_row=24267 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWprocedural or otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
procedural or other
Timeliness / legal error in prior denial of motion to reconsider
Why AAO was not persuaded
USCIS regulations do not permit excusing untimely motions to reconsider under any circumstances. The Beneficiary neither submitted new facts nor demonstrated the prior decision was based on an incorrect application of law or policy.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
USCIS regulations do not permit excusing untimely motions to reconsider under any circumstances. The Beneficiary neither submitted new facts nor demonstrated the prior decision was based on an incorrect application of law or policy.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-08-05_01_B5203; source_row=24266 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Individual of exceptional ability in the sciences, arts, or business
What the decision said
AAO did not adjudicate this issue; it remanded to the Director to consider whether the Petitioner satisfies at least three of the six regulatory criteria or has provided sufficient comparable evidence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not adjudicate this issue; it remanded to the Director to consider whether the Petitioner satisfies at least three of the six regulatory criteria or has provided sufficient comparable evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-08-02_01_B5203; source_row=24261 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Member of the professions holding an advanced degree
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner failed to provide the original Portuguese academic record and failed to provide adequate employer letters demonstrating five years of progressive interior design experience.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner failed to provide the original Portuguese academic record and failed to provide adequate employer letters demonstrating five years of progressive interior design experience.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-08-02_01_B5203; source_row=24260 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c