Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 14411–14420
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other85 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner's limited peer review experience, modest citation counts, media coverage that highlighted other individuals rather than her, speculative evidence of contributions, and conclusory recommendation letters collectively failed to establish sustained national or international acclaim or membership among the small percentage at the very top of the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's limited peer review experience, modest citation counts, media coverage that highlighted other individuals rather than her, speculative evidence of contributions, and conclusory recommendation letters collectively failed to establish sustained national or international acclaim or membership among the small percentage at the very top of the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-07-23_02_B2203; source_row=24243 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mathematics / Statistics15 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to reach final merits because the Petitioner failed to meet the step-one threshold of at least three criteria, but noted in the alternative that the aggregate record would not support a finding of sustained acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach final merits because the Petitioner failed to meet the step-one threshold of at least three criteria, but noted in the alternative that the aggregate record would not support a finding of sustained acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-07-23_01_B2203; source_row=24239 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other85 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO disagreed with the Director and found that the Petitioner's contribution in developing a real-time imaging system for an ultrasound therapy for aesthetic improvement constituted a contribution of major significance in the field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director and found that the Petitioner's contribution in developing a real-time imaging system for an ultrasound therapy for aesthetic improvement constituted a contribution of major significance in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-07-23_02_B2203; source_row=24241 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner satisfied the scholarly articles criterion, noting she authored eight scholarly articles in professional publications.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner satisfied the scholarly articles criterion, noting she authored eight scholarly articles in professional publications.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-07-23_02_B2203; source_row=24242 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
memberships in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
Membership in these associations was based on medical training, residency experience, examinations, and professional certifications rather than outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Membership in these associations was based on medical training, residency experience, examinations, and professional certifications rather than outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-07-22_01_B2203; source_row=24225 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Medicine / ClinicalProfessor
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner did not show where his positions fit in the overall organizational hierarchy or that they were leading or critical for the institutions as a whole, and the medical school's distinguished reputation was not sufficiently established.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not show where his positions fit in the overall organizational hierarchy or that they were leading or critical for the institutions as a whole, and the medical school's distinguished reputation was not sufficiently established.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-07-22_01_B2203; source_row=24230 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The awards from the 39th congress were not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized prizes for excellence in the field, and the fellowship was for training rather than recognition of excellence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The awards from the 39th congress were not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized prizes for excellence in the field, and the fellowship was for training rather than recognition of excellence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-07-22_01_B2203; source_row=24224 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c