Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
AAO found the Director erred by evaluating years (2016, 2017) prior to the 2018 priority date. Since 2018 evidence was unavailable when the case was before the Director, AAO reserved final judgment and remanded for proper evaluation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director erred by evaluating years (2016, 2017) prior to the 2018 priority date. Since 2018 evidence was unavailable when the case was before the Director, AAO reserved final judgment and remanded for proper evaluation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-07-02_01_B5203; source_row=24184 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the Petitioner had articles published about her relating to her work in journalism in professional or major trade or major media publications.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner had articles published about her relating to her work in journalism in professional or major trade or major media publications.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-07-02_01_B2203; source_row=24179 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner's awards were primarily local/regional without evidence of national significance, her published articles appeared mostly in regional publications, her judging was largely for regional/municipal awards, and her television program was documented at a municipal/regional level. AAO concluded she had not established national or international acclaim and declined to reach the sustainment issue.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner's awards were primarily local/regional without evidence of national significance, her published articles appeared mostly in regional publications, her judging was largely for regional/municipal awards, and her television program was documented at a municipal/regional level. AAO concluded she had not established national or international acclaim and declined to reach the sustainment issue.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-07-02_01_B2203; source_row=24183 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the Petitioner performed a leading or critical role for an organization with a distinguished reputation through her role on a television program.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner performed a leading or critical role for an organization with a distinguished reputation through her role on a television program.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-07-02_01_B2203; source_row=24182 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria at step 1, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria at step 1, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-07-02_05_B2203; source_row=24205 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The record contains evidence showing that the Petitioner participated as a judge at an annual reports design competition. AAO agreed with the Director that this criterion was met.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The record contains evidence showing that the Petitioner participated as a judge at an annual reports design competition. AAO agreed with the Director that this criterion was met.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-07-02_05_B2203; source_row=24201 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that letters from orchestra directors, evidence of the Petitioner's featured role as soloist in joint concerts, and her role as concertmaster for international tours established she performed a leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputations.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that letters from orchestra directors, evidence of the Petitioner's featured role as soloist in joint concerts, and her role as concertmaster for international tours established she performed a leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-07-02_04_B2203; source_row=24196 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c