Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 14461–14470

EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found that the Asia Economic Daily article discusses the Petitioner's background and work in the field beyond just announcing competition wins, and that the publication's circulation details, website ranking in South Korea, and viewership evidence establish it as major media.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Asia Economic Daily article discusses the Petitioner's background and work in the field beyond just announcing competition wins, and that the publication's circulation details, website ranking in South Korea, and viewership evidence establish it as major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-07-02_04_B2203; source_row=24194
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found that the Petitioner's multiple internationally recognized prizes, sustained roles as soloist and concertmaster with distinguished orchestras over many years, and ongoing collaborations with acclaimed musicians collectively establish sustained national or international acclaim and placement among the very top of the field.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's multiple internationally recognized prizes, sustained roles as soloist and concertmaster with distinguished orchestras over many years, and ongoing collaborations with acclaimed musicians collectively establish sustained national or international acclaim and placement among the very top of the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-07-02_04_B2203; source_row=24197
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner met the judging criterion based on her service as a judge at the annual concerto competition evaluating string students.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner met the judging criterion based on her service as a judge at the annual concerto competition evaluating string students.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-07-02_04_B2203; source_row=24195
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Finance

Issue evaluated

other

minimum qualifying experience per labor certification

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found sua sponte that the evidence submitted to establish qualifying experience was deficient: the accountant's letter was not from the employer and did not demonstrate personal knowledge of duties; the letters from the other former employer were undermined by government records showing the signatory was never listed as a director, the corporation had dissolved, and the signatory had prior personal and business relation…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found sua sponte that the evidence submitted to establish qualifying experience was deficient: the accountant's letter was not from the employer and did not demonstrate personal knowledge of duties; the letters from the other former employer were undermined by government records showing the signatory was never listed as a director, the corporation had dissolved, and the signatory had prior personal and business relationships with the Beneficiary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-07-02_02_B5203; source_row=24192
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Finance

Issue evaluated

other

ability to pay proffered wage

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO affirmed that the amended return was unreliable due to lack of IRS filing confirmation, use of incorrect amendment form (Form 1065 rather than Form 1065X), and the unexplained reclassification of a $200,000 investment in a related LLC as a receivable. The original return's net income and net current assets fell below the proffered wage, and Sonegawa factors did not cure the deficiency.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed that the amended return was unreliable due to lack of IRS filing confirmation, use of incorrect amendment form (Form 1065 rather than Form 1065X), and the unexplained reclassification of a $200,000 investment in a related LLC as a receivable. The original return's net income and net current assets fell below the proffered wage, and Sonegawa factors did not cure the deficiency.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-07-02_02_B5203; source_row=24191
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation

Why the evidence was persuasive

The evidence shows the Petitioner performed in a critical role for a distinguished organization as Director of Marketing and Media Relations, supporting the Director's determination.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The evidence shows the Petitioner performed in a critical role for a distinguished organization as Director of Marketing and Media Relations, supporting the Director's determination.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-07-02_02_B2203; source_row=24189
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO found that the senior economist title was not shown to be a prize or award for excellence but rather a certification of qualifications, and that even assuming it were, the record lacked evidence demonstrating the level of recognition the title enjoys in the field.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the senior economist title was not shown to be a prize or award for excellence but rather a certification of qualifications, and that even assuming it were, the record lacked evidence demonstrating the level of recognition the title enjoys in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-28_02_B2203; source_row=24174
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO found that while the letters described the Petitioner's contributions and the organization's reputation was documented, the evidence did not demonstrate how his contributions were of significant importance to the organization as a whole, nor how his experience compared to colleagues qualified as a critical role.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found that while the letters described the Petitioner's contributions and the organization's reputation was documented, the evidence did not demonstrate how his contributions were of significant importance to the organization as a whole, nor how his experience compared to colleagues qualified as a critical role.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-28_02_B2203; source_row=24176
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

What the decision said

AAO did not specifically resolve this criterion at step one because three other criteria were already established; related evidence was discussed in the final merits determination.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
AAO did not specifically resolve this criterion at step one because three other criteria were already established; related evidence was discussed in the final merits determination.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-28_01_B2203; source_row=24169
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO weighed the totality of evidence, including judging service, original contributions, presentations and conference roles, scholarly publications, and leading roles within the employer, concluding that Petitioner has risen to the top of his field with sustained acclaim.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO weighed the totality of evidence, including judging service, original contributions, presentations and conference roles, scholarly publications, and leading roles within the employer, concluding that Petitioner has risen to the top of his field with sustained acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-28_01_B2203; source_row=24173
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment