Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 14491–14500

EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherPhD

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found the Petitioner demonstrated original contributions of major significance through her innovative use of SHG microscopy, development of diagnostic methods, and the documented influence of her research on other scientists and clinical practitioners worldwide.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner demonstrated original contributions of major significance through her innovative use of SHG microscopy, development of diagnostic methods, and the documented influence of her research on other scientists and clinical practitioners worldwide.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-25_03_B2203; source_row=24142
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherPhD

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed with the Director that the record supports the judging criterion, noting the Petitioner has performed peer review for publications and conferences.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the record supports the judging criterion, noting the Petitioner has performed peer review for publications and conferences.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-25_03_B2203; source_row=24141
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

scholarly articles

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found that one article constitutes a scholarly article written for learned persons in the field, and that the additional documentation submitted on appeal demonstrated Futures Daily is a professional publication, satisfying this criterion.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that one article constitutes a scholarly article written for learned persons in the field, and that the additional documentation submitted on appeal demonstrated Futures Daily is a professional publication, satisfying this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-25_05_B2203; source_row=24154
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Sonegawa totality-of-the-circumstances ability to pay

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the new evidence undocumented and immaterial, that solvency alone does not show capacity to pay additional wages, and that an affiliate's resources cannot be considered because the affiliate has no legal obligation to pay the wage.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the new evidence undocumented and immaterial, that solvency alone does not show capacity to pay additional wages, and that an affiliate's resources cannot be considered because the affiliate has no legal obligation to pay the wage.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-25_03_B5203; source_row=24145
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

FinanceManager

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging

What the decision said

AAO did not separately resolve this criterion in step 1.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
AAO did not separately resolve this criterion in step 1.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-25_06_B2203; source_row=24160
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

FinanceManager

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found in the final merits determination that the Beneficiary's Institutional Investor awards, pioneering research, scholarly articles distributed globally to thousands of clients, senior leadership roles involving multibillion dollar decisions, and high salary collectively establish sustained national or international acclaim and that he is among the small percentage at the very top of the field.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found in the final merits determination that the Beneficiary's Institutional Investor awards, pioneering research, scholarly articles distributed globally to thousands of clients, senior leadership roles involving multibillion dollar decisions, and high salary collectively establish sustained national or international acclaim and that he is among the small percentage at the very top of the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-25_06_B2203; source_row=24165
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

FinanceManager

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

awards

What the decision said

AAO did not separately resolve this criterion in step 1, instead noting the awards evidence in the final merits determination. The awards were addressed in the final merits section as evidence of acclaim rather than as a step-1 criterion finding.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO did not separately resolve this criterion in step 1, instead noting the awards evidence in the final merits determination. The awards were addressed in the final merits section as evidence of acclaim rather than as a step-1 criterion finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-25_06_B2203; source_row=24157
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

FinanceManager

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership

What the decision said

Petitioner conceded the membership criterion on appeal, so AAO did not address it.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Petitioner conceded the membership criterion on appeal, so AAO did not address it.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-25_06_B2203; source_row=24158
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

FinanceManager

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

scholarly articles

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed with the Director that the Beneficiary meets the scholarly articles criterion based on his authorship of scholarly articles in the field of quantitative finance.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Beneficiary meets the scholarly articles criterion based on his authorship of scholarly articles in the field of quantitative finance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-25_06_B2203; source_row=24162
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

FinanceManager

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

What the decision said

AAO did not separately resolve this criterion in step 1; original contributions evidence was addressed in the final merits section.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
AAO did not separately resolve this criterion in step 1; original contributions evidence was addressed in the final merits section.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-25_06_B2203; source_row=24161
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment