Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in the aggregate that the record would not support the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in the aggregate that the record would not support the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-11_01_B2203; source_row=24096 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
While the Petitioner's company experienced business success, the record did not establish that these achievements constituted original contributions of major significance to the field. Technological claims were not corroborated, referenced impacts were prospective or limited in scope, and supporting letters lacked specifics and merely used hyperbolic language.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
While the Petitioner's company experienced business success, the record did not establish that these achievements constituted original contributions of major significance to the field. Technological claims were not corroborated, referenced impacts were prospective or limited in scope, and supporting letters lacked specifics and merely used hyperbolic language.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-06_02_B2203; source_row=24088 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
The bank records did not conclusively show income from the claimed source; comparison of income to the general Indian populace rather than to others in the field was inapposite; the Monster Salary Index was from 2017 and not relevant to the documented income periods; and U.S. salary data was inapplicable because the Petitioner worked outside the United States.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The bank records did not conclusively show income from the claimed source; comparison of income to the general Indian populace rather than to others in the field was inapposite; the Monster Salary Index was from 2017 and not relevant to the documented income periods; and U.S. salary data was inapplicable because the Petitioner worked outside the United States.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-06_02_B2203; source_row=24090 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed the Petitioner performed a leading or critical role as the company's founder but disagreed with the director on the distinguished reputation element. AAO found that the company's partnerships with well-established aerospace companies and its reputation within the Indian defense establishment were sufficient to demonstrate a distinguished reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the Petitioner performed a leading or critical role as the company's founder but disagreed with the director on the distinguished reputation element. AAO found that the company's partnerships with well-established aerospace companies and its reputation within the Indian defense establishment were sufficient to demonstrate a distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-06_02_B2203; source_row=24089 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the totality of evidence establishes sustained international acclaim and placement among the small percentage at the top of the field, citing the Petitioner's decades-long career, founding of multiple organizations, frequent media features and expert commentary, invitations to speak at professional events, participation in UK Ministry of Justice advisory panels on claims management regulation, chairing of industry…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the totality of evidence establishes sustained international acclaim and placement among the small percentage at the top of the field, citing the Petitioner's decades-long career, founding of multiple organizations, frequent media features and expert commentary, invitations to speak at professional events, participation in UK Ministry of Justice advisory panels on claims management regulation, chairing of industry judging panels, and receipt of industry awards.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-06_01_B2203; source_row=24085 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed that the Petitioner has participated as a judge at several claims management conferences, including multiple years of the annual industry conference.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner has participated as a judge at several claims management conferences, including multiple years of the annual industry conference.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-06_01_B2203; source_row=24083 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the record contains published articles in professional publications about the Petitioner relating to his work in claims management, including a Claims Management Magazine article about his formation of his organization and an interview regarding the future of claims management companies.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the record contains published articles in professional publications about the Petitioner relating to his work in claims management, including a Claims Management Magazine article about his formation of his organization and an interview regarding the future of claims management companies.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-06_01_B2203; source_row=24082 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
ability to pay proffered wage (including multiple I-140 petitions)
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Director's calculation methodology was incorrect because he used the current petition's proffered wage for all 147 petitions and did not credit actual wages paid to other beneficiaries. AAO also found the Director failed to consider the totality of circumstances. The issue is remanded for correct analysis.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's calculation methodology was incorrect because he used the current petition's proffered wage for all 147 petitions and did not credit actual wages paid to other beneficiaries. AAO also found the Director failed to consider the totality of circumstances. The issue is remanded for correct analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-06_01_B5203; source_row=24086 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c