Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 14561–14570

EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Biomedical / Life Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging

Why the evidence was persuasive

The record reflects that the Petitioner reviewed manuscripts for the journal Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology, and Medicine.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
The record reflects that the Petitioner reviewed manuscripts for the journal Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology, and Medicine.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-04_01_B2203; source_row=24063
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Biomedical / Life Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership

What the decision said

AAO noted that the Petitioner referenced membership criterion evidence on appeal but chose to consider it in the final merits determination rather than ruling on it as a separate criterion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO noted that the Petitioner referenced membership criterion evidence on appeal but chose to consider it in the final merits determination rather than ruling on it as a separate criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-04_01_B2203; source_row=24066
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Biomedical / Life Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · High remuneration

high salary

Why the evidence was persuasive

The record contains salary surveys from the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists indicating that the Petitioner's base salary is high relative to others in his field, further supported by Project Management Institute data and Department of Labor Career One Stop website.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The record contains salary surveys from the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists indicating that the Petitioner's base salary is high relative to others in his field, further supported by Project Management Institute data and Department of Labor Career One Stop website.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-04_01_B2203; source_row=24065
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Biomedical / Life Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

What the decision said

AAO noted that the Petitioner referenced original contributions evidence on appeal but chose to consider it in the final merits determination rather than ruling on it as a separate criterion.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
AAO noted that the Petitioner referenced original contributions evidence on appeal but chose to consider it in the final merits determination rather than ruling on it as a separate criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-04_01_B2203; source_row=24067
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Biomedical / Life Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role

What the decision said

AAO noted that the Petitioner referenced leading or critical role evidence on appeal but chose to consider it in the final merits determination rather than ruling on it as a separate criterion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO noted that the Petitioner referenced leading or critical role evidence on appeal but chose to consider it in the final merits determination rather than ruling on it as a separate criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-04_01_B2203; source_row=24068
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Biomedical / Life Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

scholarly articles

Why the evidence was persuasive

The record shows the Petitioner published articles in Enzyme Engineering, the Journal of Chromatography, and Biochemistry and Analytical Biochemistry.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
The record shows the Petitioner published articles in Enzyme Engineering, the Journal of Chromatography, and Biochemistry and Analytical Biochemistry.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-04_01_B2203; source_row=24064
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherFaculty

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the New York Daily News and New York Post materials were actually advertisements, not published articles about the Petitioner. The Sing Tao Daily article lacked a complete certified translation. The Flushing Times article did not demonstrate the publication constituted major media.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the New York Daily News and New York Post materials were actually advertisements, not published articles about the Petitioner. The Sing Tao Daily article lacked a complete certified translation. The Flushing Times article did not demonstrate the publication constituted major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-05-30_01_B2203; source_row=24048
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherFaculty

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed the Petitioner established leading roles but found the record failed to demonstrate that the schools had a distinguished reputation marked by eminence, distinction, or excellence. Media coverage was unidentified, a foreign-language article lacked certified translation, and competition results did not demonstrate the school's distinguished reputation.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the Petitioner established leading roles but found the record failed to demonstrate that the schools had a distinguished reputation marked by eminence, distinction, or excellence. Media coverage was unidentified, a foreign-language article lacked certified translation, and competition results did not demonstrate the school's distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-05-30_01_B2203; source_row=24051
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherFaculty

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

scholarly articles

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Chinese-language books lacked properly certified translations. The New York Daily News material was an advertisement containing only an excerpt of a thesis, not a full scholarly article in a qualifying publication. The World Journal article lacked a complete certified translation and lacked the indicia of a scholarly article.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
The Chinese-language books lacked properly certified translations. The New York Daily News material was an advertisement containing only an excerpt of a thesis, not a full scholarly article in a qualifying publication. The World Journal article lacked a complete certified translation and lacked the indicia of a scholarly article.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-05-30_01_B2203; source_row=24050
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherFaculty

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found the Director erred by imposing a sustained acclaim requirement at the criteria stage. AAO found the evidence sufficient to show the Petitioner judged applicants on fluency, teaching ability, and other relevant skills, thereby demonstrating judging of the work of others in his field.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director erred by imposing a sustained acclaim requirement at the criteria stage. AAO found the evidence sufficient to show the Petitioner judged applicants on fluency, teaching ability, and other relevant skills, thereby demonstrating judging of the work of others in his field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-05-30_01_B2203; source_row=24049
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment