Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Ability to pay via net income and net current assets
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's 2017 net income was only $13,221 (per Schedule K line 18, not the higher ordinary business income figure), and its net current assets were negative ($-14,040), so neither figure was sufficient to cover the $32,113 shortfall between the proffered wage and the Beneficiary's 2017 wages.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's 2017 net income was only $13,221 (per Schedule K line 18, not the higher ordinary business income figure), and its net current assets were negative ($-14,040), so neither figure was sufficient to cover the $32,113 shortfall between the proffered wage and the Beneficiary's 2017 wages.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-05-16_02_B5203; source_row=23993 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Ability to pay via totality of circumstances (Sonegawa)
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's tax returns contradicted its claim of recovering from a one-time income dip; gross receipts actually declined in 2017. Bank statements show account balances, not sustainable ability to pay, and the Petitioner failed to explain why its tax return painted an inaccurate picture.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's tax returns contradicted its claim of recovering from a one-time income dip; gross receipts actually declined in 2017. Bank statements show account balances, not sustainable ability to pay, and the Petitioner failed to explain why its tax return painted an inaccurate picture. The owner's stated willingness to forego officer's compensation was based on an erroneous calculation significantly underestimating the true shortfall, so it did not establish actual willingness to forego the necessary amount.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-05-16_02_B5203; source_row=23994 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Beneficiary received only $48,300 in 2017, the priority year, which was below the proffered wage of $80,413, so wages-paid alone do not establish continuing ability to pay from the priority date onward.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Beneficiary received only $48,300 in 2017, the priority year, which was below the proffered wage of $80,413, so wages-paid alone do not establish continuing ability to pay from the priority date onward.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-05-16_02_B5203; source_row=23992 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The network executive's letter did not explain or support how the award is recognized for its national standing, and the Petitioner failed to provide independent, objective evidence of the awards' national or international recognition for excellence in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The network executive's letter did not explain or support how the award is recognized for its national standing, and the Petitioner failed to provide independent, objective evidence of the awards' national or international recognition for excellence in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-05-15_01_B2203; source_row=23982 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
On the prior appeal (referenced here for procedural history), AAO determined the Petitioner fulfilled the artistic display criterion. This finding is not disturbed on the motion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
On the prior appeal (referenced here for procedural history), AAO determined the Petitioner fulfilled the artistic display criterion. This finding is not disturbed on the motion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-05-15_01_B2203; source_row=23984 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
On the prior appeal (referenced here for procedural history), AAO determined the Petitioner fulfilled the judging criterion. This finding is not disturbed on the motion.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
On the prior appeal (referenced here for procedural history), AAO determined the Petitioner fulfilled the judging criterion. This finding is not disturbed on the motion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-05-15_01_B2203; source_row=23983 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
Published material about the individual in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
Online evidence lacked original text, making translations unverifiable. Video translations were not matched to specific videos. Wikipedia articles about Shant TV and Vitamin Club were accorded no evidentiary weight, and even if credited, were insufficient to establish those outlets as major trade or major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Online evidence lacked original text, making translations unverifiable. Video translations were not matched to specific videos. Wikipedia articles about Shant TV and Vitamin Club were accorded no evidentiary weight, and even if credited, were insufficient to establish those outlets as major trade or major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-05-14_01_B2203; source_row=23973 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Major awardNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Major award
One-time major internationally recognized award
Why AAO was not persuaded
The certificates and photographs submitted lacked supporting evidence of the awards' status as major, internationally recognized awards. One certificate lacked a properly certified translation. The awards did not approach the level of globally recognized awards like the Nobel Prize or Olympic Medal.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The certificates and photographs submitted lacked supporting evidence of the awards' status as major, internationally recognized awards. One certificate lacked a properly certified translation. The awards did not approach the level of globally recognized awards like the Nobel Prize or Olympic Medal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-05-14_01_B2203; source_row=23970 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The manuals were described as intended for beginning athletes and referees, not advanced scholarly information for those with profound knowledge in the field. The letter from the publisher lacked the signer's title and company information. The record did not include the manuals' contents or English translations to assess their scholarly nature.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The manuals were described as intended for beginning athletes and referees, not advanced scholarly information for those with profound knowledge in the field. The letter from the publisher lacked the signer's title and company information. The record did not include the manuals' contents or English translations to assess their scholarly nature.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-05-14_01_B2203; source_row=23976 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
Original contributions of major significance in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
Letters about coached athletes lacked verifiable evidence of claimed awards and the Petitioner submitted no evidence of his training or qualifications as a coach. Even if coaching two nationally successful athletes, this did not amount to an original contribution of major significance. The manuals lacked evidence of originality and their impact was not supported by independent corroborating evidence.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
Letters about coached athletes lacked verifiable evidence of claimed awards and the Petitioner submitted no evidence of his training or qualifications as a coach. Even if coaching two nationally successful athletes, this did not amount to an original contribution of major significance. The manuals lacked evidence of originality and their impact was not supported by independent corroborating evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-05-14_01_B2203; source_row=23975 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c