Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 14671–14680
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Physics61 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's aggregate citation count (over 1,100), individual article citation numbers, and six recommendation letters failed to establish that her contributions rose to the level of major significance. The citations were not shown to be unusually high relative to the field, and the letters were either too general and conclusory or spoke only to potential future impact rather than demonstrated present significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's aggregate citation count (over 1,100), individual article citation numbers, and six recommendation letters failed to establish that her contributions rose to the level of major significance. The citations were not shown to be unusually high relative to the field, and the letters were either too general and conclusory or spoke only to potential future impact rather than demonstrated present significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-05-03_01_B2203; source_row=23934 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found it unclear whether the Petitioner's role was as a formal judge/juror or merely as a mentor who evaluates students. The letter lacks specificity and is uncorroborated; publicly available event programs did not list the Petitioner as a jury member.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO found it unclear whether the Petitioner's role was as a formal judge/juror or merely as a mentor who evaluates students. The letter lacks specificity and is uncorroborated; publicly available event programs did not list the Petitioner as a jury member.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-05-03_02_B2203; source_row=23937 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
Reference letters credit the Petitioner with launching a platform and influencing media creation, but provide no documentary corroboration of broader industry impact, and evidence of influencing one individual's work or establishing a signature at one magazine does not rise to the level of major significance in the field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
Reference letters credit the Petitioner with launching a platform and influencing media creation, but provide no documentary corroboration of broader industry impact, and evidence of influencing one individual's work or establishing a signature at one magazine does not rise to the level of major significance in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-05-03_02_B2203; source_row=23938 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
The unsigned translator letter submitted on appeal does not comply with the certification requirement, and the Petitioner also failed to establish that Elle Quebec qualifies as a professional or major trade publication or other major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The unsigned translator letter submitted on appeal does not comply with the certification requirement, and the Petitioner also failed to establish that Elle Quebec qualifies as a professional or major trade publication or other major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-05-03_02_B2203; source_row=23936 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why AAO was not persuaded
While AAO disagreed that this criterion is limited to visual artists, the Petitioner failed to establish that his tear sheets represent display at artistic exhibitions or showcases: many lacked attribution to the Petitioner, some lacked publication identification, and those that did identify the publication did not show that the magazine qualifies as an artistic exhibition or showcase rather than commercial media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
While AAO disagreed that this criterion is limited to visual artists, the Petitioner failed to establish that his tear sheets represent display at artistic exhibitions or showcases: many lacked attribution to the Petitioner, some lacked publication identification, and those that did identify the publication did not show that the magazine qualifies as an artistic exhibition or showcase rather than commercial media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-05-03_02_B2203; source_row=23939 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO accepted that the Petitioner had a leading or critical role but found the record insufficient to establish that the company had a distinguished reputation, as no independent industry publications corroborated reputation claims.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO accepted that the Petitioner had a leading or critical role but found the record insufficient to establish that the company had a distinguished reputation, as no independent industry publications corroborated reputation claims.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-05-03_03_B2203; source_row=23945 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
Patents established original work but not major significance; reference letters showed some impact but did not demonstrate widespread acceptance, commentary, or remarkable influence on the field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
Patents established original work but not major significance; reference letters showed some impact but did not demonstrate widespread acceptance, commentary, or remarkable influence on the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-05-03_03_B2203; source_row=23943 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
The accolades were awarded to the company, not the Petitioner, and the issuing entities were provincial rather than national; the record did not demonstrate national or international recognition.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The accolades were awarded to the company, not the Petitioner, and the issuing entities were provincial rather than national; the record did not demonstrate national or international recognition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-05-03_03_B2203; source_row=23941 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The association documents did not substantiate that membership required outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts; one association admitted only enterprises, not individuals.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The association documents did not substantiate that membership required outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts; one association admitted only enterprises, not individuals.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-05-03_03_B2203; source_row=23942 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner authored scholarly articles in professional publications, satisfying the scholarly articles criterion. AAO agreed with the Director on this point.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner authored scholarly articles in professional publications, satisfying the scholarly articles criterion. AAO agreed with the Director on this point.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-05-03_01_B2203; source_row=23933 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c