Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 14691–14700
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
Leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with distinguished reputation
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the Petitioner's documentation shows the Beneficiary has performed in a critical role as senior manager of events for the organization, which has a distinguished reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's documentation shows the Beneficiary has performed in a critical role as senior manager of events for the organization, which has a distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-05-02_01_B2203; source_row=23929 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical20 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that recommendation letters lacked specific examples of major significance, only attesting to novelty without explaining widespread implementation or impact on the broader field. Media coverage and patents did not demonstrate impact on orthopedics as a whole, and no citation evidence or evidence of widespread reliance by other orthopedists was provided.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that recommendation letters lacked specific examples of major significance, only attesting to novelty without explaining widespread implementation or impact on the broader field. Media coverage and patents did not demonstrate impact on orthopedics as a whole, and no citation evidence or evidence of widespread reliance by other orthopedists was provided.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-05-01_01_B2203; source_row=23915 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical20 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the record did not establish that the Petitioner performed a critical role for the hospital as a whole. No organizational chart or comparative evidence was provided to show how his role differentiated him from other principal doctors and research team leaders, nor to show he was of significant importance to the outcome of the organization's activities.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the record did not establish that the Petitioner performed a critical role for the hospital as a whole. No organizational chart or comparative evidence was provided to show how his role differentiated him from other principal doctors and research team leaders, nor to show he was of significant importance to the outcome of the organization's activities.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-05-01_01_B2203; source_row=23916 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
App Store 'awards' were not demonstrated to be actual prizes or awards; capital investments were received by the company, not the Petitioner personally, and are not prizes or awards; NYSA admission was received by the company, not the Petitioner; the Maxim award was not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
App Store 'awards' were not demonstrated to be actual prizes or awards; capital investments were received by the company, not the Petitioner personally, and are not prizes or awards; NYSA admission was received by the company, not the Petitioner; the Maxim award was not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-05-01_02_B2203; source_row=23918 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
published material about the alien in professional or major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The articles were self-authored opinions, not material about the Petitioner. Screenshots about app purchases or launches mentioned the Petitioner only tangentially and were about the products, not him. Required author information was missing from translations, and the Petitioner did not show the websites qualified as major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The articles were self-authored opinions, not material about the Petitioner. Screenshots about app purchases or launches mentioned the Petitioner only tangentially and were about the products, not him. Required author information was missing from translations, and the Petitioner did not show the websites qualified as major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-05-01_02_B2203; source_row=23920 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Business / ManagementManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why AAO was not persuaded
While the Petitioner showed he held leading and critical roles, he failed to establish that any of the organizations have a distinguished reputation. Evidence related to app coverage rather than organizational reputation, and recommendation letters discussed his accomplishments without independently establishing the companies' reputations.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
While the Petitioner showed he held leading and critical roles, he failed to establish that any of the organizations have a distinguished reputation. Evidence related to app coverage rather than organizational reputation, and recommendation letters discussed his accomplishments without independently establishing the companies' reputations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-05-01_02_B2203; source_row=23922 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
For the first association, the Petitioner did not show he was an actual member or that the membership criteria reflect outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts. For SLP, membership was shown to screen for 'outstanding skills' and community potential rather than outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
For the first association, the Petitioner did not show he was an actual member or that the membership criteria reflect outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts. For SLP, membership was shown to screen for 'outstanding skills' and community potential rather than outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-05-01_02_B2203; source_row=23919 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The record contained contradictory salary figures ($160,000 claimed vs. $70,900 in a contract) that were unresolved by independent evidence. The salary comparison charts were not explained. Three project contracts did not establish high salary, and the app sale price was not documented.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record contained contradictory salary figures ($160,000 claimed vs. $70,900 in a contract) that were unresolved by independent evidence. The salary comparison charts were not explained. Three project contracts did not establish high salary, and the app sale price was not documented.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-05-01_02_B2203; source_row=23923 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c