Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
The Director analyzed the wrong year (2017) when the priority date fell in 2018; evidence for 2018 was not yet available, so remand is required for the Director to obtain and evaluate the correct year's financials under the totality-of-circumstances standard.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Director analyzed the wrong year (2017) when the priority date fell in 2018; evidence for 2018 was not yet available, so remand is required for the Director to obtain and evaluate the correct year's financials under the totality-of-circumstances standard.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-24_01_B5203; source_row=23885 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Director's final merits assessment legally deficient for failing to consider the totality of the evidence—it addressed only the judging criterion, contradicted its own step-1 findings, applied step-1 analytical questions at step-2, and offered unexplained conclusions. Remand was required for a proper assessment.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's final merits assessment legally deficient for failing to consider the totality of the evidence—it addressed only the judging criterion, contradicted its own step-1 findings, applied step-1 analytical questions at step-2, and offered unexplained conclusions. Remand was required for a proper assessment.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-23_01_B2203; source_row=23876 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that the employer letter documented at least five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in information technology management, satisfying the regulatory standard for equivalency to a master's degree under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2).
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the employer letter documented at least five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in information technology management, satisfying the regulatory standard for equivalency to a master's degree under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-23_01_B5203; source_row=23877 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner did not identify a specific original artistic contribution. The management contract did not constitute a contribution to the music industry. Reference letters attested to her skills as a performer but did not identify specific original contributions of major significance or explain how they influenced the field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not identify a specific original artistic contribution. The management contract did not constitute a contribution to the music industry. Reference letters attested to her skills as a performer but did not identify specific original contributions of major significance or explain how they influenced the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-22_01_B2203; source_row=23868 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
The First Prize certificate was incomplete and the supporting website related to a different festival. The Best Female Interpretation award did not clearly indicate it was a top prize. The Summer Hits and Public Prize certificates lacked evidence of criteria. The last three certificates related to participation in festivals as presenter/coordinator, not excellence as a singer.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The First Prize certificate was incomplete and the supporting website related to a different festival. The Best Female Interpretation award did not clearly indicate it was a top prize. The Summer Hits and Public Prize certificates lacked evidence of criteria. The last three certificates related to participation in festivals as presenter/coordinator, not excellence as a singer.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-22_01_B2203; source_row=23864 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The first association's letter did not detail membership requirements or the judging process. The second organization was described as 'more of a social organization' and not shown to be an association for singers requiring outstanding achievements.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The first association's letter did not detail membership requirements or the judging process. The second organization was described as 'more of a social organization' and not shown to be an association for singers requiring outstanding achievements.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-22_01_B2203; source_row=23865 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The management contract letter was not properly translated and its value did not match the types of evidence specified in the criterion. The YouTube subscriber count was attributable to a channel, not solely to the Petitioner. Video views and streaming numbers did not demonstrate monetary value or commercial success analogous to box office receipts or record sales.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The management contract letter was not properly translated and its value did not match the types of evidence specified in the criterion. The YouTube subscriber count was attributable to a channel, not solely to the Petitioner. Video views and streaming numbers did not demonstrate monetary value or commercial success analogous to box office receipts or record sales.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-22_01_B2203; source_row=23871 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
judging the work of others in the same or an allied field
Why AAO was not persuaded
The letter established that the Petitioner judged a beauty competition, not a singing competition. The contestants were not shown to be singers or to have been judged on their work as singers.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The letter established that the Petitioner judged a beauty competition, not a singing competition. The contestants were not shown to be singers or to have been judged on their work as singers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-22_01_B2203; source_row=23867 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
Some articles were incomplete or lacked required date/author/publication information. Some articles focused on the Petitioner's personal life rather than her work as a singer. The circulation, web traffic, and social media follower figures were raw numbers not compared to other Albanian publications and were insufficient to demonstrate major media status.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Some articles were incomplete or lacked required date/author/publication information. Some articles focused on the Petitioner's personal life rather than her work as a singer. The circulation, web traffic, and social media follower figures were raw numbers not compared to other Albanian publications and were insufficient to demonstrate major media status.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-22_01_B2203; source_row=23866 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c