Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 14751–14760
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other28 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
Coverage by a single website and adoption by two entities did not establish widespread implementation or major impact on the field. Reference letters speculated on future potential rather than established present major significance, and conclusory language carries little probative weight.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
Coverage by a single website and adoption by two entities did not establish widespread implementation or major impact on the field. Reference letters speculated on future potential rather than established present major significance, and conclusory language carries little probative weight.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-17_02_B2203; source_row=23858 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievement
What the decision said
The Petitioner acknowledged on appeal that he 'misunderstood the requirement[s]' and that his membership does not require outstanding achievements, so AAO did not further address this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner acknowledged on appeal that he 'misunderstood the requirement[s]' and that his membership does not require outstanding achievements, so AAO did not further address this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-17_01_B2203; source_row=23849 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other28 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold evidentiary criteria, but noted in dicta that the record does not support the required level of acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold evidentiary criteria, but noted in dicta that the record does not support the required level of acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-17_02_B2203; source_row=23860 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Beneficiary received $74,472 in W-2 wages in 2016, which did not equal or exceed the proffered wage of $130,666; however, AAO credits the wages paid toward the overall analysis.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Beneficiary received $74,472 in W-2 wages in 2016, which did not equal or exceed the proffered wage of $130,666; however, AAO credits the wages paid toward the overall analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-17_01_B5203; source_row=23853 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Ability to pay based on totality of circumstances (Matter of Sonegawa)
Why AAO was not persuaded
Despite revenue growth, receipts were insufficient relative to the combined wage obligations. Officer compensation claims lacked supporting officer attestations, retained earnings are duplicative of net income and generally non-liquid, and no documentary evidence of industry reputation was submitted.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Despite revenue growth, receipts were insufficient relative to the combined wage obligations. Officer compensation claims lacked supporting officer attestations, retained earnings are duplicative of net income and generally non-liquid, and no documentary evidence of industry reputation was submitted.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-17_01_B5203; source_row=23855 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Ability to pay based on net income and net current assets covering combined I-140 wage burden
Why AAO was not persuaded
Even with the complete 25-beneficiary chart, the 2016 net income of $82,218 fell short of the $240,354.24 shortfall between proffered wages and wages paid to eight beneficiaries, leaving a deficit of $158,136.24.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Even with the complete 25-beneficiary chart, the 2016 net income of $82,218 fell short of the $240,354.24 shortfall between proffered wages and wages paid to eight beneficiaries, leaving a deficit of $158,136.24.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-17_01_B5203; source_row=23854 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Social Sciences60 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner's publications, citation frequency, conference presentations, and reference letters were insufficient to show contributions of major significance. The citation numbers were not verified as reliable, and the letters failed to demonstrate widespread commentary, authoritative recognition, or field-level impact rising to major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's publications, citation frequency, conference presentations, and reference letters were insufficient to show contributions of major significance. The citation numbers were not verified as reliable, and the letters failed to demonstrate widespread commentary, authoritative recognition, or field-level impact rising to major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-16_01_B2203; source_row=23831 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Social Sciences60 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the record lacked sufficient documentation such as letters from managing personnel explaining the Petitioner's leading or critical role, and the Petitioner failed to show his contributions were crucial to the success of the organization.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the record lacked sufficient documentation such as letters from managing personnel explaining the Petitioner's leading or critical role, and the Petitioner failed to show his contributions were crucial to the success of the organization.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-16_01_B2203; source_row=23833 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c