Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 14781–14790
NIWprocedural or otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
procedural or other
timely filing of motion
Why AAO was not persuaded
The motion was filed 34 days after issuance, exceeding the 33-day mail-extended limit, and no justification for the delay was provided.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The motion was filed 34 days after issuance, exceeding the 33-day mail-extended limit, and no justification for the delay was provided.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-15_02_B5203; source_row=23829 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical50 reviews
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO reversed the Director, finding that the high citation rate, expert letters documenting breakthroughs in deep brain stimulation surgery, media coverage of clinical trials, and extensive judging experience collectively established sustained acclaim and placement at the very top of the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reversed the Director, finding that the high citation rate, expert letters documenting breakthroughs in deep brain stimulation surgery, media coverage of clinical trials, and extensive judging experience collectively established sustained acclaim and placement at the very top of the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-15_01_B2203; source_row=23824 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations or establishments
Why AAO was not persuaded
While the Petitioner performs in a leading or critical role for the academy, the record does not demonstrate that the academy has a distinguished reputation. As to the federation, the record does not show he holds a leadership position or that his contributions are crucial to the organization's success or standing.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
While the Petitioner performs in a leading or critical role for the academy, the record does not demonstrate that the academy has a distinguished reputation. As to the federation, the record does not show he holds a leadership position or that his contributions are crucial to the organization's success or standing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-09_03_B2203; source_row=23813 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
The record lacks sufficient evidence that the Petitioner's wins in two amateur events are recognized outside the sponsoring organization on a national or international level. He did not show media attention or information about participants' caliber that might indicate the awards' prestige.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record lacks sufficient evidence that the Petitioner's wins in two amateur events are recognized outside the sponsoring organization on a national or international level. He did not show media attention or information about participants' caliber that might indicate the awards' prestige.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-09_03_B2203; source_row=23808 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's team membership was based on amateur competition wins, and the record does not establish that those wins constitute 'outstanding achievements,' that the organization is the sole national governing body, or that the judges were recognized national or international experts.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's team membership was based on amateur competition wins, and the record does not establish that those wins constitute 'outstanding achievements,' that the organization is the sole national governing body, or that the judges were recognized national or international experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-09_03_B2203; source_row=23809 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
While the evidence shows the Petitioner's methods are innovative and have been adopted by some coaches, the record does not establish that they have been widely accepted or have influenced the field as a whole at a level of major significance. General praise letters without documentation of broad field-wide impact are insufficient.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
While the evidence shows the Petitioner's methods are innovative and have been adopted by some coaches, the record does not establish that they have been widely accepted or have influenced the field as a whole at a level of major significance. General praise letters without documentation of broad field-wide impact are insufficient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-09_03_B2203; source_row=23812 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
The totality of the record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or that the Petitioner is among the small percentage at the very top of his field. His athletic and coaching accomplishments do not rise to the level of a career of acclaimed work.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The totality of the record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or that the Petitioner is among the small percentage at the very top of his field. His athletic and coaching accomplishments do not rise to the level of a career of acclaimed work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-09_03_B2203; source_row=23814 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c