Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 14801–14810

EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging the work of others

Why the evidence was persuasive

The record, including a letter from the organization's president, sufficiently establishes that the Petitioner served as a judge at prestigious championship events, judging more than six world title fights and determining winners.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
The record, including a letter from the organization's president, sufficiently establishes that the Petitioner served as a judge at prestigious championship events, judging more than six world title fights and determining winners.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-09_03_B2203; source_row=23811
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to waive job offer requirement

What the decision said

AAO declined to address the third prong because the Petitioner failed to establish the second prong, making further analysis of the balancing factors unnecessary.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO declined to address the third prong because the Petitioner failed to establish the second prong, making further analysis of the balancing factors unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-09_01_B5203; source_row=23802
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found that the Petitioner's proposed clinical research focused on improving medical practices for children with chronic health conditions has substantial merit, and that the potential prospective impact of her research—disseminated through journals and conferences—satisfies the national importance requirement.…

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's proposed clinical research focused on improving medical practices for children with chronic health conditions has substantial merit, and that the potential prospective impact of her research—disseminated through journals and conferences—satisfies the national importance requirement. AAO noted, however, that the Petitioner's clinical work as a physician (as distinct from her research) did not meet the national importance element because it would not impact the field more broadly.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-09_01_B5203; source_row=23800
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging

Why the evidence was persuasive

The record reflects that the petitioner served as a judge at an independent film festival; AAO agreed with the director that this criterion is fulfilled.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
The record reflects that the petitioner served as a judge at an independent film festival; AAO agreed with the director that this criterion is fulfilled.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-09_02_B2203; source_row=23805
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

What the decision said

AAO declined to formally conduct the final merits determination because the petitioner failed to meet the step-1 threshold of three criteria. AAO noted in dicta that the overall record does not support the required acclaim.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO declined to formally conduct the final merits determination because the petitioner failed to meet the step-1 threshold of three criteria. AAO noted in dicta that the overall record does not support the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-09_02_B2203; source_row=23807
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Artistic displayEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Artistic display

artistic display

Why the evidence was persuasive

The record reflects that the petitioner has performed in theaters and at festivals; AAO agreed with the director that this criterion is fulfilled.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The record reflects that the petitioner has performed in theaters and at festivals; AAO agreed with the director that this criterion is fulfilled.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-09_02_B2203; source_row=23806
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner met the judging criterion based on her service as a member of a judging panel.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner met the judging criterion based on her service as a member of a judging panel.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-09_04_B2203; source_row=23817
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

What the decision said

AAO explicitly reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the step-one threshold, but noted in the aggregate that the record did not support the required acclaim.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the step-one threshold, but noted in the aggregate that the record did not support the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-09_04_B2203; source_row=23820
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Artistic displayEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Artistic display

display of work

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's film screenings at various venues satisfied the display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases criterion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's film screenings at various venues satisfied the display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-09_04_B2203; source_row=23818
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherManager

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found that the Petitioner participated as a judge of the work of others, satisfying the judging criterion, contrary to the Director's finding.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner participated as a judge of the work of others, satisfying the judging criterion, contrary to the Director's finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-09_01_B2203; source_row=23792
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment