Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 14881–14890
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / ClinicalFaculty
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO accepted the Director's finding that the high salary criterion was met at step 1 and proceeded to final merits.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO accepted the Director's finding that the high salary criterion was met at step 1 and proceeded to final merits.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-03-14_01_B2203; source_row=23714 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mathematics / StatisticsPhD
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner's research had not been frequently cited, had not affected educational strategies at multiple institutions, and had not generated substantial positive discourse. Her professional memberships did not establish a record of success, and several post-dated the petition filing.…
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner's research had not been frequently cited, had not affected educational strategies at multiple institutions, and had not generated substantial positive discourse. Her professional memberships did not establish a record of success, and several post-dated the petition filing. The support letters lacked specific examples of how her work had been implemented or generated positive interest among relevant parties.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-03-12_03_B5203; source_row=23710 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found substantial merit in the bodyboarding and environmental education school concept, but found the Petitioner had not shown the endeavor's impact would extend beyond his specific school and participants to affect the field more broadly, and had not shown significant potential for U.S. job creation or substantial positive economic effects.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found substantial merit in the bodyboarding and environmental education school concept, but found the Petitioner had not shown the endeavor's impact would extend beyond his specific school and participants to affect the field more broadly, and had not shown significant potential for U.S. job creation or substantial positive economic effects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-03-12_01_B5203; source_row=23703 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The new evidence submitted on motion—including publication acceptances, a Google Scholar citation report showing only four total citations, an acknowledgment in a manual, and resubmitted recommendation letters—did not show a record of success or sufficient interest from the field. Post-filing evidence could not establish eligibility at the time of filing.…
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
The new evidence submitted on motion—including publication acceptances, a Google Scholar citation report showing only four total citations, an acknowledgment in a manual, and resubmitted recommendation letters—did not show a record of success or sufficient interest from the field. Post-filing evidence could not establish eligibility at the time of filing. Previously addressed letters remained insufficient to show the Petitioner's work had generated progress or discourse in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-03-12_02_B5203; source_row=23707 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mathematics / StatisticsPhD
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive job offer requirement
What the decision said
AAO declined to address the third prong because the Petitioner had not established the second prong, making further discussion of balancing factors unnecessary.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to address the third prong because the Petitioner had not established the second prong, making further discussion of balancing factors unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-03-12_03_B5203; source_row=23711 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mathematics / StatisticsPhD
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the Petitioner's proposed research aimed at improving U.S. students' educational performance in STEM areas has substantial merit, and that she documented both the substantial merit and national importance of her proposed research through letters from colleagues, U.S. Department of Education materials, and evidence of broader dissemination.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner's proposed research aimed at improving U.S. students' educational performance in STEM areas has substantial merit, and that she documented both the substantial merit and national importance of her proposed research through letters from colleagues, U.S. Department of Education materials, and evidence of broader dissemination.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-03-12_03_B5203; source_row=23709 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO had previously found in its appellate decision that the Petitioner's proposed research has both substantial merit and national importance. This finding was not revisited on motion.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO had previously found in its appellate decision that the Petitioner's proposed research has both substantial merit and national importance. This finding was not revisited on motion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-03-12_02_B5203; source_row=23706 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
recognition for achievements and significant contributions
Why the evidence was persuasive
Letters from professional bodyboarders, environmental organizations, project collaborators, company sponsors, media coverage, and certificates from a city government together demonstrated recognition of the Petitioner's achievements and significant contributions, satisfying criterion (F).
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Letters from professional bodyboarders, environmental organizations, project collaborators, company sponsors, media coverage, and certificates from a city government together demonstrated recognition of the Petitioner's achievements and significant contributions, satisfying criterion (F).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-03-12_01_B5203; source_row=23702 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Director found, and AAO agreed, that the Petitioner's membership in the Association of Environmental Engineering Professionals of Espirito Santo satisfies criterion (E).
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Director found, and AAO agreed, that the Petitioner's membership in the Association of Environmental Engineering Professionals of Espirito Santo satisfies criterion (E).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-03-12_01_B5203; source_row=23701 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c