Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 14811490

NIWexceptional ability otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

license or certification

Why AAO was not persuaded

The course completion certificates from CITI, WHO, and CDC do not establish a license to practice a profession or a certification for a profession or occupation. A license confers legal authority to work in an occupation, and a certification requires demonstrating competency; course completions do not meet this standard.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The course completion certificates from CITI, WHO, and CDC do not establish a license to practice a profession or a certification for a profession or occupation. A license confers legal authority to work in an occupation, and a certification requires demonstrating competency; course completions do not meet this standard.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-02-04_01_B5203; source_row=42971
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWexceptional ability otherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

official academic record

Why the evidence was persuasive

The Petitioner obtained a bachelor's degree in psychology with a concentration in health psychology, which relates to his described area of exceptional ability. The criterion is satisfied.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner obtained a bachelor's degree in psychology with a concentration in health psychology, which relates to his described area of exceptional ability. The criterion is satisfied.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-02-04_01_B5203; source_row=42969
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot established

Case facts

Biomedical / Life Sciences40 papers75 citations

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

Why AAO was not persuaded

Employment by a university is not membership in an association under this criterion. The record does not establish the selection criteria for the UNESCO senior researcher role. The Engineering Academy of Armenia documentation does not establish that the academic advisor role requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Employment by a university is not membership in an association under this criterion. The record does not establish the selection criteria for the UNESCO senior researcher role. The Engineering Academy of Armenia documentation does not establish that the academic advisor role requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-02-03_04_B2203; source_row=42959
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Major awardNot established

Case facts

Biomedical / Life Sciences40 papers75 citations

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Major award

one-time major internationally recognized award

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Director concluded the record does not establish the Petitioner received a one-time achievement of a major, internationally recognized award. The Petitioner did not contest this on appeal.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Director concluded the record does not establish the Petitioner received a one-time achievement of a major, internationally recognized award. The Petitioner did not contest this on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-02-03_04_B2203; source_row=42957
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot established

Case facts

Biomedical / Life Sciences40 papers75 citations

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media

Why AAO was not persuaded

The 2022 journal article mentions the Petitioner's last name only once in passing among 75 citations, devotes only two sentences to her research, and equivocates on its explanatory significance. The article is about the author's own research, not about the Petitioner.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The 2022 journal article mentions the Petitioner's last name only once in passing among 75 citations, devotes only two sentences to her research, and equivocates on its explanatory significance. The article is about the author's own research, not about the Petitioner.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-02-03_04_B2203; source_row=42960
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot established

Case facts

Biomedical / Life Sciences40 papers75 citations

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence

Why AAO was not persuaded

The record does not establish the grant was awarded to the Petitioner rather than to the project manager, director, or research center. The patent was granted to establish an intellectual property right for an invention, not for excellence in the field, and thus does not qualify as a prize or award for excellence.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The record does not establish the grant was awarded to the Petitioner rather than to the project manager, director, or research center. The patent was granted to establish an intellectual property right for an invention, not for excellence in the field, and thus does not qualify as a prize or award for excellence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-02-03_04_B2203; source_row=42958
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established

Case facts

Biomedical / Life Sciences40 papers75 citations

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation

Why AAO was not persuaded

The record does not establish the Petitioner held a leading or critical role at any of the referenced organizations, as other individuals were identified in leading roles at the research project, the patent listing does not distinguish her role, and her faculty and academic advisor roles lack specificity.…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The record does not establish the Petitioner held a leading or critical role at any of the referenced organizations, as other individuals were identified in leading roles at the research project, the patent listing does not distinguish her role, and her faculty and academic advisor roles lack specificity. Even if a leading role were established, the record does not demonstrate the organizations have a distinguished reputation with objective evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-02-03_04_B2203; source_row=42965
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot established

Case facts

Environment / Energy

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed with the Director that the evidence does not establish national importance. Although the endeavor has substantial merit, the Petitioner did not demonstrate how her environmental consulting company would have broader implications beyond her own company, or how it would broadly enhance societal welfare, contribute to a valuable technology, or produce substantial positive economic effects.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the evidence does not establish national importance. Although the endeavor has substantial merit, the Petitioner did not demonstrate how her environmental consulting company would have broader implications beyond her own company, or how it would broadly enhance societal welfare, contribute to a valuable technology, or produce substantial positive economic effects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-02-03_02_B5203; source_row=42946
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established

Case facts

Business / ManagementMaster’s

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the submitted letters described past projects but did not explain how or establish that those projects are of major significance in the field, and the Petitioner had not shown that a project for a specific employer or client has the wider significance the regulation requires.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the submitted letters described past projects but did not explain how or establish that those projects are of major significance in the field, and the Petitioner had not shown that a project for a specific employer or client has the wider significance the regulation requires.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-02-03_03_B2203; source_row=42952
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipNot established

Case facts

Business / ManagementMaster’s

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

scholarly articles

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed that the evidence did not support the Petitioner's claim of authorship of the newspaper article, found the article not scholarly in nature, and found that the strategic development program was not established to be a scholarly article published in a professional or major trade publication or other major media.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the evidence did not support the Petitioner's claim of authorship of the newspaper article, found the article not scholarly in nature, and found that the strategic development program was not established to be a scholarly article published in a professional or major trade publication or other major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-02-03_03_B2203; source_row=42953
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
Back to assessment