Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 14901–14910
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the new website ranking and traffic evidence did not establish the websites' status as major media, declined to rely on publisher self-promotional content, noted continuing deficiencies in author/date documentation, and found the alleged King5 News article lacked identifying characteristics or proof the website is major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the new website ranking and traffic evidence did not establish the websites' status as major media, declined to rely on publisher self-promotional content, noted continuing deficiencies in author/date documentation, and found the alleged King5 News article lacked identifying characteristics or proof the website is major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-03-07_01_B2203; source_row=23682 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the Beneficiary played a vital role in his company's receipt of nationally and internationally recognized automotive awards, sufficient to consider him a recipient. The awards (including one from an exhibition described as 'one of the world's most influential automobile exhibitions') meet the regulatory standard for excellence in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Beneficiary played a vital role in his company's receipt of nationally and internationally recognized automotive awards, sufficient to consider him a recipient. The awards (including one from an exhibition described as 'one of the world's most influential automobile exhibitions') meet the regulatory standard for excellence in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-03-07_02_B2203; source_row=23683 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherPhysician
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the totality of evidence — including the Beneficiary's decades of automotive industry leadership, dramatic business turnarounds, internationally recognized awards, conference invitations, publications, and expert testimonials — established sustained national and international acclaim at the very top of his field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the totality of evidence — including the Beneficiary's decades of automotive industry leadership, dramatic business turnarounds, internationally recognized awards, conference invitations, publications, and expert testimonials — established sustained national and international acclaim at the very top of his field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-03-07_02_B2203; source_row=23689 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherPhysician
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the Director applied the wrong comparison standard; the regulation requires comparison to the field generally, not only the highest-paid executives. The record shows the Beneficiary's $800,000 base salary with $250,000 signing bonus is high relative to others in the field per DOL data.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director applied the wrong comparison standard; the regulation requires comparison to the field generally, not only the highest-paid executives. The record shows the Beneficiary's $800,000 base salary with $250,000 signing bonus is high relative to others in the field per DOL data.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-03-07_02_B2203; source_row=23685 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other30 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO agreed the criterion was not met, finding that citations were used as background rather than highlighting the work as particularly important, that conference presentations and book chapter invitations alone do not establish major significance, that research coverage was limited to the Petitioner's own institutions, and that expert letters did not sufficiently demonstrate how contributions were of major significance…
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed the criterion was not met, finding that citations were used as background rather than highlighting the work as particularly important, that conference presentations and book chapter invitations alone do not establish major significance, that research coverage was limited to the Petitioner's own institutions, and that expert letters did not sufficiently demonstrate how contributions were of major significance in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-03-06_01_B2203; source_row=23679 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that the Fellowship is a scientific training opportunity rather than a prize or award for excellence in the field, and the claim that it is 'one of the most prestigious national awards' was not corroborated by media coverage or other supporting evidence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the Fellowship is a scientific training opportunity rather than a prize or award for excellence in the field, and the claim that it is 'one of the most prestigious national awards' was not corroborated by media coverage or other supporting evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-03-06_01_B2203; source_row=23677 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c