Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the record sufficient to demonstrate that the Beneficiary won awards nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in gymnastics, including team placements representing Japan at major international events.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the record sufficient to demonstrate that the Beneficiary won awards nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in gymnastics, including team placements representing Japan at major international events.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-02-15_01_B2203; source_row=23598 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other14 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted advisory that the record does not support the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted advisory that the record does not support the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-02-15_01_B2203; source_row=23603 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Applying the Sonegawa totality-of-circumstances standard, AAO found the Petitioner had demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence its continuing ability to pay the proffered wage to the Beneficiary and its other I-140 beneficiaries from the priority date onward.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Applying the Sonegawa totality-of-circumstances standard, AAO found the Petitioner had demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence its continuing ability to pay the proffered wage to the Beneficiary and its other I-140 beneficiaries from the priority date onward.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-02-15_01_B5203; source_row=23604 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's acclaim was primarily tied to his former band's success through 2012, and he failed to show that this recognition carried forward or that he achieved individual sustained national or international acclaim between 2012 and the October 2016 filing date.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's acclaim was primarily tied to his former band's success through 2012, and he failed to show that this recognition carried forward or that he achieved individual sustained national or international acclaim between 2012 and the October 2016 filing date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-02-15_03_B2203; source_row=23615 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The letters of recommendation were first submitted on appeal; the record lacked sufficient corroborating evidence of the claimed radio play and acclaim, and the Petitioner failed to show how the evidence equated to sustained national or international acclaim.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The letters of recommendation were first submitted on appeal; the record lacked sufficient corroborating evidence of the claimed radio play and acclaim, and the Petitioner failed to show how the evidence equated to sustained national or international acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-02-15_03_B2203; source_row=23611 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
While AAO acknowledged the Petitioner's role as lead singer from 1998 to 2012, the record did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim after the band disbanded, and the Latin Rastafarian community connection was not shown to relate to a distinguished organization in the reggae field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
While AAO acknowledged the Petitioner's role as lead singer from 1998 to 2012, the record did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim after the band disbanded, and the Latin Rastafarian community connection was not shown to relate to a distinguished organization in the reggae field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-02-15_03_B2203; source_row=23613 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
Well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner's nine citations, patent application, society membership, and travel award insufficient to demonstrate a record of success or substantial interest from relevant parties. Evidence post-dating the petition filing date was improper under 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(1), and no citation comparison data was provided.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner's nine citations, patent application, society membership, and travel award insufficient to demonstrate a record of success or substantial interest from relevant parties. Evidence post-dating the petition filing date was improper under 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(1), and no citation comparison data was provided.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-02-13_01_B5203; source_row=23595 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c