Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 14991–15000
NIWlicense or certificationEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
license or certification
license or certification to practice the profession
Why the evidence was persuasive
Although the state tax consultant licenses postdate the filing, the October 2015 IRS enrolled agent credential predates filing and satisfies the criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Although the state tax consultant licenses postdate the filing, the October 2015 IRS enrolled agent credential predates filing and satisfies the criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-02-11_01_B5203; source_row=23584 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
Even assuming contenders came from different parts of the world, the Petitioner did not present evidence that the prizes are recognized in the field on a national or international level, such as media coverage of the awards or confirmation that the honors are accepted in the field as national or international recognition for excellence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Even assuming contenders came from different parts of the world, the Petitioner did not present evidence that the prizes are recognized in the field on a national or international level, such as media coverage of the awards or confirmation that the honors are accepted in the field as national or international recognition for excellence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-02-07_01_B2203; source_row=23573 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or other significantly high remuneration for services
Why AAO was not persuaded
The record lacks comparative compensation data in the field, and the Petitioner's immigration status is irrelevant to the criterion; he failed to establish that his salary or remuneration is qualifying under the regulation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record lacks comparative compensation data in the field, and the Petitioner's immigration status is irrelevant to the criterion; he failed to establish that his salary or remuneration is qualifying under the regulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-02-07_01_B2203; source_row=23576 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO reviewed the record in its entirety and found it does not support a finding of sustained national or international acclaim or that the Petitioner is among the small percentage at the very top of the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO reviewed the record in its entirety and found it does not support a finding of sustained national or international acclaim or that the Petitioner is among the small percentage at the very top of the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-02-07_01_B2203; source_row=23577 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of the alien's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why AAO was not persuaded
Project spec books were created for clients and not intended as artistic displays; social media accounts are not artistic exhibitions or showcases; completed buildings on public streets are not displays at artistic exhibitions or showcases. Qualifying displays would be those held at galleries, museums, or other artistic venues.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Project spec books were created for clients and not intended as artistic displays; social media accounts are not artistic exhibitions or showcases; completed buildings on public streets are not displays at artistic exhibitions or showcases. Qualifying displays would be those held at galleries, museums, or other artistic venues.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-02-07_01_B2203; source_row=23575 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO conducted an abbreviated final merits review and found the record insufficient to show the petitioner has risen to the very top of the field, noting his accomplishments reflect a researcher progressing toward the top rather than one already at the top.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO conducted an abbreviated final merits review and found the record insufficient to show the petitioner has risen to the very top of the field, noting his accomplishments reflect a researcher progressing toward the top rather than one already at the top.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-02-07_02_B2203; source_row=23581 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Materials Science14 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner's citation counts and reference letters did not establish that his work had been widely accepted, broadly implemented, or had remarkably influenced the field of materials science. Most citing articles only briefly referenced his work among many others, and reference letters lacked sufficient specificity to show major significance beyond incremental contributions.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's citation counts and reference letters did not establish that his work had been widely accepted, broadly implemented, or had remarkably influenced the field of materials science. Most citing articles only briefly referenced his work among many others, and reference letters lacked sufficient specificity to show major significance beyond incremental contributions.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-02-07_02_B2203; source_row=23580 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The petitioner presented documentation from professional publications confirming he served as a reviewer and reviewed manuscripts in 2016 and 2017, satisfying the judging criterion.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner presented documentation from professional publications confirming he served as a reviewer and reviewed manuscripts in 2016 and 2017, satisfying the judging criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-02-07_02_B2203; source_row=23578 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The petitioner authored scholarly articles published in professional journals including Energy & Environmental Science and ACS Nano, satisfying the scholarly articles criterion.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner authored scholarly articles published in professional journals including Energy & Environmental Science and ACS Nano, satisfying the scholarly articles criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-02-07_02_B2203; source_row=23579 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The invitation letters did not show actual participation as a judge, and one event's subject matter was unidentified. The 'Outstanding Young Achievers' event did not establish that the Petitioner's involvement entailed judging others' work.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The invitation letters did not show actual participation as a judge, and one event's subject matter was unidentified. The 'Outstanding Young Achievers' event did not establish that the Petitioner's involvement entailed judging others' work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-02-05_01_B2203; source_row=23559 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c