Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
ability to pay proffered wage for multiple I-140 beneficiaries
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's net current assets were far less than needed to cover total proffered wage obligations to 71 other beneficiaries. The unaudited financial statements submitted on appeal do not comply with 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2), and the totality of circumstances does not support ability to pay.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's net current assets were far less than needed to cover total proffered wage obligations to 71 other beneficiaries. The unaudited financial statements submitted on appeal do not comply with 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2), and the totality of circumstances does not support ability to pay.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-02-01_03_B5203; source_row=23539 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
primary minimum requirement: five years of qualifying experience in the job offered
Why AAO was not persuaded
The proffered position is primarily supervisory in nature. The Beneficiary's prior nursing jobs involved only direct patient care with no supervisory functions. Since the experience requirement must be met with experience in the job offered — which is supervisory — and none of the Beneficiary's prior experience was supervisory, she does not satisfy the five-year experience component.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The proffered position is primarily supervisory in nature. The Beneficiary's prior nursing jobs involved only direct patient care with no supervisory functions. Since the experience requirement must be met with experience in the job offered — which is supervisory — and none of the Beneficiary's prior experience was supervisory, she does not satisfy the five-year experience component.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-02-01_03_B5203; source_row=23541 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
alternate minimum requirement: master's degree equivalent in nursing
Why AAO was not persuaded
The record shows the Beneficiary earned a baccalaureate degree, and the educational evaluation submitted by the Petitioner itself concludes it is equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree. AACRAO EDGE confirms Philippine bachelor's degrees are comparable to U.S. bachelor's degrees. The degree does not meet the master's equivalent requirement.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record shows the Beneficiary earned a baccalaureate degree, and the educational evaluation submitted by the Petitioner itself concludes it is equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree. AACRAO EDGE confirms Philippine bachelor's degrees are comparable to U.S. bachelor's degrees. The degree does not meet the master's equivalent requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-02-01_03_B5203; source_row=23540 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
visa classification change request (clerical error claim)
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner failed to establish the EB-2 selection was a clerical error. Counsel's bare assertion was unsupported by details or corroborating evidence, and the seven-month delay in raising the issue—only after an RFE—along with labor certification requirements consistent with EB-2 intent, undermined the clerical error claim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner failed to establish the EB-2 selection was a clerical error. Counsel's bare assertion was unsupported by details or corroborating evidence, and the seven-month delay in raising the issue—only after an RFE—along with labor certification requirements consistent with EB-2 intent, undermined the clerical error claim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-02-01_01_B5203; source_row=23536 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO had previously found that the Petitioner did not show his petroleum engineering/data science work for his employer had implications beyond that company at a level demonstrating national importance, although his proposed carbon sequestration research did have substantial merit and national importance. The motion did not overcome this finding.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO had previously found that the Petitioner did not show his petroleum engineering/data science work for his employer had implications beyond that company at a level demonstrating national importance, although his proposed carbon sequestration research did have substantial merit and national importance. The motion did not overcome this finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-01-31_02_B5203; source_row=23532 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO reaffirmed that the recommendation letters lacked specific examples of impact or implementation of the Petitioner's work, that download counts did not establish influence, and that post-filing evidence (the 2018 paper and abstract, employment with the oil and gas company) could not be used to show eligibility at time of filing. Country conditions and family information were deemed irrelevant to the Dhanasar analysis.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO reaffirmed that the recommendation letters lacked specific examples of impact or implementation of the Petitioner's work, that download counts did not establish influence, and that post-filing evidence (the 2018 paper and abstract, employment with the oil and gas company) could not be used to show eligibility at time of filing. Country conditions and family information were deemed irrelevant to the Dhanasar analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-01-31_02_B5203; source_row=23533 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
documentation of acquisition of predecessor's business
Why AAO was not persuaded
The EMSA expressly preserved the predecessor's ownership of its intellectual property and other business assets, contemplated continued operation of the predecessor (including a one-year renewable term and termination provisions returning employees), and transferred only employees, not assets. Therefore the Petitioner did not acquire the essential rights and obligations needed to carry on the predecessor's business.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The EMSA expressly preserved the predecessor's ownership of its intellectual property and other business assets, contemplated continued operation of the predecessor (including a one-year renewable term and termination provisions returning employees), and transferred only employees, not assets. Therefore the Petitioner did not acquire the essential rights and obligations needed to carry on the predecessor's business.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-01-31_01_B5203; source_row=23531 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The NPR article, while from a qualifying major media outlet, was about a Massachusetts band and only referenced the Petitioner tangentially as a dancer in a music video. Other published materials were performance listings (not about her), remaining pieces lacked evidence that the publications qualified as professional or major trade media, and some pieces lacked author identification as required by the regulation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The NPR article, while from a qualifying major media outlet, was about a Massachusetts band and only referenced the Petitioner tangentially as a dancer in a music video. Other published materials were performance listings (not about her), remaining pieces lacked evidence that the publications qualified as professional or major trade media, and some pieces lacked author identification as required by the regulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-01-30_02_B2203; source_row=23528 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO noted that record evidence suggested the Petitioner had judged performances for admission to a New York dance school, but declined to resolve whether criterion iv was met because even assuming arguendo it was satisfied, she would still fall short of three criteria.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO noted that record evidence suggested the Petitioner had judged performances for admission to a New York dance school, but declined to resolve whether criterion iv was met because even assuming arguendo it was satisfied, she would still fall short of three criteria.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-01-30_02_B2203; source_row=23529 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c