Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 15041–15050
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
On alternative review of the totality of the record, AAO found the Petitioner had not demonstrated the sustained national or international acclaim or career of acclaimed work in the field required for EB-1A classification.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
On alternative review of the totality of the record, AAO found the Petitioner had not demonstrated the sustained national or international acclaim or career of acclaimed work in the field required for EB-1A classification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-01-30_02_B2203; source_row=23530 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that while the expert letters attested to originality, they spoke prospectively of impact rather than demonstrating realized major significance. Citation counts alone are insufficient without showing wide implementation in the field. Evidence of influencing two clinical practitioners and inclusion in one book chapter and one diagnostic test did not demonstrate field-wide major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that while the expert letters attested to originality, they spoke prospectively of impact rather than demonstrating realized major significance. Citation counts alone are insufficient without showing wide implementation in the field. Evidence of influencing two clinical practitioners and inclusion in one book chapter and one diagnostic test did not demonstrate field-wide major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-01-30_01_B2203; source_row=23524 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to fully reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed at step one, but noted in passing that the aggregate record does not support a finding of sustained acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to fully reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed at step one, but noted in passing that the aggregate record does not support a finding of sustained acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-01-30_01_B2203; source_row=23526 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The record reflects that the Petitioner has conducted reviews for Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, Advances in Genomics and Genetics, and other journals, satisfying this criterion.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The record reflects that the Petitioner has conducted reviews for Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, Advances in Genomics and Genetics, and other journals, satisfying this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-01-30_01_B2203; source_row=23523 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO agreed that the Petitioner's articles in Human Molecular Genetics, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, Nucleic Acids Research, and other journals satisfied this criterion.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed that the Petitioner's articles in Human Molecular Genetics, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, Nucleic Acids Research, and other journals satisfied this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-01-30_01_B2203; source_row=23525 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWprocedural or otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
procedural or other
Beneficiary standing as affected party
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO held that the Beneficiary is not an affected party because he never requested to port to another employer before revocation, making Matter of V-S-G- Inc. inapplicable. The cited Ninth Circuit case (Abboud) concerned judicial standing, not administrative appeal standing, and the district court decision (Ilyabaev) is not binding on AAO. Equitable estoppel is unavailable in administrative proceedings before USCIS.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO held that the Beneficiary is not an affected party because he never requested to port to another employer before revocation, making Matter of V-S-G- Inc. inapplicable. The cited Ninth Circuit case (Abboud) concerned judicial standing, not administrative appeal standing, and the district court decision (Ilyabaev) is not binding on AAO. Equitable estoppel is unavailable in administrative proceedings before USCIS.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-01-29_03_B5203; source_row=23522 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed the Petitioner failed to establish ability to pay because it did not provide requested information on the dozens of other I-140 beneficiaries, line of credit and bank statements are not appropriate substitutes for the regulatory evidence, and projected future income from the Beneficiary's employment cannot be considered.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the Petitioner failed to establish ability to pay because it did not provide requested information on the dozens of other I-140 beneficiaries, line of credit and bank statements are not appropriate substitutes for the regulatory evidence, and projected future income from the Beneficiary's employment cannot be considered.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-01-29_02_B5203; source_row=23520 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Schedule A professional nurse eligibility requirements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Beneficiary possessed only an Illinois RN license, not a New York license; there was no NCLEX-RN passage or CGFNS certificate in the record. New York and Illinois are not in the nurse licensure compact, so the Illinois license does not satisfy the requirement for a license in the state of intended employment.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Beneficiary possessed only an Illinois RN license, not a New York license; there was no NCLEX-RN passage or CGFNS certificate in the record. New York and Illinois are not in the nurse licensure compact, so the Illinois license does not satisfy the requirement for a license in the state of intended employment.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-01-29_01_B5203; source_row=22310 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c