Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Beneficiary meets minimum experience requirements of the labor certification
Why AAO was not persuaded
The employer letter confirmed employment dates and Java/J2EE experience generally but did not establish that the Beneficiary used Java and J2EE for the required 36 months, and did not clarify the nature of other positions held at that employer.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The employer letter confirmed employment dates and Java/J2EE experience generally but did not establish that the Beneficiary used Java and J2EE for the required 36 months, and did not clarify the nature of other positions held at that employer.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-01-23_01_B5203; source_row=23507 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Only one year's tax return was submitted, covering a fiscal year beginning July 1, 2015, but there was no evidence for 2016-17 or 2017-18. Additionally, the Petitioner must also account for combined proffered wages owed under other petitions it had filed.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Only one year's tax return was submitted, covering a fiscal year beginning July 1, 2015, but there was no evidence for 2016-17 or 2017-18. Additionally, the Petitioner must also account for combined proffered wages owed under other petitions it had filed.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-01-23_01_B5203; source_row=23508 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner had not shown that her proposed endeavor would impact vulnerable populations at a level consistent with national importance, had not sufficiently described or documented plans for wide distribution, had not provided sufficient information about the number of individuals to be impacted, and had not shown that her financial forecasts demonstrated substantial positive economic effects on the regional o…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner had not shown that her proposed endeavor would impact vulnerable populations at a level consistent with national importance, had not sufficiently described or documented plans for wide distribution, had not provided sufficient information about the number of individuals to be impacted, and had not shown that her financial forecasts demonstrated substantial positive economic effects on the regional or national economy.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-01-22_01_B5203; source_row=23503 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the Petitioner did not demonstrate that the submitted articles were from professional or major trade publications or major media. The Wikipedia citation was unreliable and did not establish major medium status, and one article lacked an author.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the Petitioner did not demonstrate that the submitted articles were from professional or major trade publications or major media. The Wikipedia citation was unreliable and did not establish major medium status, and one article lacked an author.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-01-18_01_B2203; source_row=23487 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the Petitioner did not initially claim this criterion, and the three articles she submitted were published after the petition was filed. Eligibility must be established from the time of filing.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the Petitioner did not initially claim this criterion, and the three articles she submitted were published after the petition was filed. Eligibility must be established from the time of filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-01-18_01_B2203; source_row=23489 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
Although the evidence showed the festivals and awards were sanctioned by Chinese governmental entities, the Petitioner did not demonstrate that the garnered awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field, nor that the field recognizes these contests as national or international awards for excellence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Although the evidence showed the festivals and awards were sanctioned by Chinese governmental entities, the Petitioner did not demonstrate that the garnered awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field, nor that the field recognizes these contests as national or international awards for excellence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-01-18_01_B2203; source_row=23485 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Chemistry / Chemical Engineering8 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that despite the Petitioner's citation rankings, licensing agreements, patent, research funding, and media coverage, none of these individually or collectively demonstrated that his work had already achieved major significance in the field. Letters of support lacked specific examples and were largely conclusory, and prospective or potential impacts do not satisfy this criterion.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that despite the Petitioner's citation rankings, licensing agreements, patent, research funding, and media coverage, none of these individually or collectively demonstrated that his work had already achieved major significance in the field. Letters of support lacked specific examples and were largely conclusory, and prospective or potential impacts do not satisfy this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-01-18_04_B2203; source_row=23501 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Although not required given the failure to meet three criteria, the AAO reviewed the totality of the record and found it insufficient to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or that the Petitioner is among the small percentage at the top of the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Although not required given the failure to meet three criteria, the AAO reviewed the totality of the record and found it insufficient to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or that the Petitioner is among the small percentage at the top of the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-01-18_03_B2203; source_row=23498 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c